feng2009 wrote:
有沒有人願意 2025...(恕刪)
你怎麼都不膩？
老是演同一齣
個人積分：4393分
文章編號：91197618
個人積分：3068分
文章編號：91197666
個人積分：21305分
文章編號：91197944
個人積分：4393分
文章編號：91198085
個人積分：21305分
文章編號：91198348
個人積分：148分
文章編號：91198747
個人積分：8363分
文章編號：91198773
個人積分：21305分
文章編號：91200319
個人積分：8363分
文章編號：91200344
個人積分：13878分
文章編號：91200412
annabelles wrote:
他肯定是幻想的，因為他這棟樓前面說thanks for receiving me,早就穿幫了，這種程度的英文幻想美國年輕女生跟他聊。
我努力地爬了這樓，樓主讓人質疑的地方真的有不少，簽證，機票，太多地方讓我起疑。 樓主說的thanks a lot for receiving me也是滿怪的。 不過假如樓主是聽音樂，看歌詞"學"英文的話，我倒是想到一個可能
When I think about how can you justify using the word "receive", rather than hospitality, or other more common phrase to convey taking care of someone on a trip, I recalled a song, which also somewhat mirrors OP's "hotel" staying theme.
In Eagle's "Hotel California", there is a segment that goes "we are programmed to receive".
I think OP probably tried to use google translate or other tools to generate English. At least he's trying, just not very good at it. However, if you consider the purpose of a language is to communicate, then as long as the other party can understand, even with guess work, that might be sufficient.
