REALPOWER wrote:
諷刺的是，你文章的樓上才叫你不要用台灣看世界，
BRIC國家被你挑出來，VIP經濟圈你也不要，CIVETS也沒聽過, MIST? VISTA? NEXT 11? 都很爛都有問題啦？
光纖很好申辦的！低收入戶還有補助！
你自己去查查你列的國家在國際上的發展評價，再來回說這些國家政經有問題
看你挑的國家就知道你的國際觀有多大
或許，全世界就你熱愛的台灣風調雨順國泰民安？
只會ptt的戰鬥民族？你對以色列不熟喔！
你怎都不講講你挑的那些國家中，政經不好(你說的)是跟徵兵制有關？
還是隨便你青菜講講就算？
就說不是在爭打嘴炮冠軍了，你要嘴炮王的稱號自己拿去就好啦，不跟你爭啦~(恕刪)
我學歷是在國外拿的，也正在國外工作，這樣你還要說我沒有國際觀我也沒辦法啦
再說，你丟幾個經濟區縮寫就能代表你很有研究？
你到底有看過多少篇academic papers來證實你的理論啊
我今天在這跟你嘴炮是因為看不過你把 當兵=對國家經濟有益 當正確的觀念來宣傳
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1988, for example, the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) studied the effects of reinstituting conscription and concluded that an equally effective force under a draft would be more costly, even in a narrow budget sense, than the existing force. With a draft, a larger total force would be needed because draftees serve a shorter initial enlistment period than today’s volunteers. Therefore, a larger fraction of the force would be involved in overhead activities such as training, supervising less-experienced personnel, and traveling to a first assignment.
A draft also forces some of the wrong people into the military—people who are more productive in other jobs or who have a strong distaste for military service. That has other serious consequences for the country. A draft, especially one with exemptions, causes wasteful avoidance behavior such as the unwanted schooling, emigration, early marriages, and distorted career choices of the 1950s and 1960s. A draft also weakens the military because the presence of unwilling conscripts increases turnover (conscripts reenlist at lower rates than volunteers), lowers morale, and causes discipline problems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
上面這一篇的作者Christopher Jehn，曾經是Director of the Marine Corps Operations Analysis Group at the Center for Naval Analyses in Alexandria, Virginia.
你有興趣的話，自己去把全文找出來讀
我是很喜歡台灣啦，但是我還是反對徵兵制，徵兵制唯一達到的訴求只有公平，因為人人都要當兵（在台灣這一點是假的啦，看看多少權貴的子女有當兵就知道了）但是這個訴求卻是用浪費國家社會經濟資源來達成的。
我也不再跟你嘴炮了啦，你愛信什麽是你家的事。
