個人積分：1070分
文章編號：66947586
個人積分：14964分
文章編號：66947616
yuxian wrote:
這串幫蘋果說話的應...(恕刪)
apple 的原文信在這里，請仔細閱讀，比較不會被蘋果日報誤導。
不過批評 apple 用力的 yuxian 會選蘋果日報也合理，攻擊性強的文章比較好。
-----------------
A Message to Our Customers about iPhone Batteries and Performance
We've been hearing feedback from our customers about the way we handle performance for iPhones with older batteries and how we have communicated that process. We know that some of you feel Apple has let you down. We apologize. There's been a lot of misunderstanding about this issue, so we would like to clarify and let you know about some changes we're making.
First and foremost, we have never — and would never — do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades. Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love, and making iPhones last as long as possible is an important part of that.
How batteries age
All rechargeable batteries are consumable components that become less effective as they chemically age and their ability to hold a charge diminishes. Time and the number of times a battery has been charged are not the only factors in this chemical aging process.
Device use also affects the performance of a battery over its lifespan. For example, leaving or charging a battery in a hot environment can cause a battery to age faster. These are characteristics of battery chemistry, common to lithium-ion batteries across the industry.
A chemically aged battery also becomes less capable of delivering peak energy loads, especially in a low state of charge, which may result in a device unexpectedly shutting itself down in some situations.
To help customers learn more about iPhone's rechargeable battery and the factors affecting its performance, we've posted a new support article, iPhone Battery and Performance.
It should go without saying that we think sudden, unexpected shutdowns are unacceptable. We don't want any of our users to lose a call, miss taking a picture or have any other part of their iPhone experience interrupted if we can avoid it.
Preventing unexpected shutdowns
About a year ago in iOS 10.2.1, we delivered a software update that improves power management during peak workloads to avoid unexpected shutdowns on iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, and iPhone SE. With the update, iOS dynamically manages the maximum performance of some system components when needed to prevent a shutdown. While these changes may go unnoticed, in some cases users may experience longer launch times for apps and other reductions in performance.
Customer response to iOS 10.2.1 was positive, as it successfully reduced the occurrence of unexpected shutdowns. We recently extended the same support for iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus in iOS 11.2.
Of course, when a chemically aged battery is replaced with a new one, iPhone performance returns to normal when operated in standard conditions.
Recent user feedback
Over the course of this fall, we began to receive feedback from some users who were seeing slower performance in certain situations. Based on our experience, we initially thought this was due to a combination of two factors: a normal, temporary performance impact when upgrading the operating system as iPhone installs new software and updates apps, and minor bugs in the initial release which have since been fixed.
We now believe that another contributor to these user experiences is the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s devices, many of which are still running on their original batteries.
Addressing customer concerns
We've always wanted our customers to be able to use their iPhones as long as possible. We're proud that Apple products are known for their durability, and for holding their value longer than our competitors' devices.
To address our customers' concerns, to recognize their loyalty and to regain the trust of anyone who may have doubted Apple's intentions, we've decided to take the following steps:
Apple is reducing the price of an out-of-warranty iPhone battery replacement by $50 — from $79 to $29 — for anyone with an iPhone 6 or later whose battery needs to be replaced, starting in late January and available worldwide through December 2018. Details will be provided soon on apple.com.
Early in 2018, we will issue an iOS software update with new features that give users more visibility into the health of their iPhone's battery, so they can see for themselves if its condition is affecting performance.
As always, our team is working on ways to make the user experience even better, including improving how we manage performance and avoid unexpected shutdowns as batteries age.
At Apple, our customers' trust means everything to us. We will never stop working to earn and maintain it. We are able to do the work we love only because of your faith and support — and we will never forget that or take it for granted.
個人積分：282分
文章編號：66947635
就像那種邪教教主最後都會大量性侵女信徒
因為信徒盲目到連性侵都認為是加持
把教主寵壞了
果粉也是差不多
明明是惡意侵犯使用者的權益
用下三濫手段偷降使用者的速度
都可以自動偵測降速
跳出一個訊息警告會很難嗎？
故意不告知使用者
這就是明顯的惡意操控消費者
這樣也能盲信的支持認為是為了消費者好
到底盲信有沒有底線呀？
一直以來蘋果都故意去操控消費者額外花錢
這只是其中的一個方式
之前的TLC偷料
最後壞的區塊多了
也是會導致手機變慢
沒人發現就被蘋果狠賺一次
偷料本身就賺
變慢強迫換機再賺
差別就是這次惡搞被抓包了
果粉醒醒吧
其實不止這些事件
蘋果在產品規格中也常操控消費者
蘋果官方從來不公布ＲＡＭ的大小
因為蘋果就是要從中弄鬼
第一代的大螢幕i6
引發果粉的換機潮
但是i6的RAM是所有蘋果裝置最末代的1G
跟老舊的ipad3 mini2同樣都是１Ｇ
RAM不足就是閃退與變慢
到時候自然又會誘發i6的換機潮
蘋果非常陰險呀
只是果粉就是願意去盲信
個人積分：14964分
文章編號：66947647
個人積分：14964分
文章編號：66947806
yuxian wrote:
這串幫蘋果說話的應...(恕刪)
這個中央社的中文報導還比較貼近 原文信。
為什麼就是有人要引用比較偏頗的報導呢?
-----------------------
（中央社記者吳家豪台北2017年12月29日電）蘋果公司（Apple）變更iOS軟體導致舊款iPhone降速以延長電池壽命的做法引起爭議，蘋果今天為此道歉，並宣布大幅調降舊款iPhone已過保固的電池替換費用。
蘋果宣布，針對需要更換電池的iPhone 6及其之後推出的機種，已過保固的電池替換費用從79美元（約新台幣2356元）降價到29美元（約新台幣865元），降幅50美元，從2018年1月底開始至12月在全球適用。
蘋果今天發布新聞稿指出，蘋果了解有些客戶認為蘋果讓他們失望了，蘋果為此致歉，並強調從未刻意縮短任何蘋果裝置的壽命、或降低使用者體驗來促使客戶升級。
蘋東除了調降更換電池費用外，同時也公開電池技術說明文件，意味著蘋果有誠意的面對消費者並解決問題。
為解決客戶疑慮，蘋果預計自2018年初開始，將釋出iOS軟體更新，新功能將讓用戶更容易檢視iPhone電池的健康程度，來確認是否影響效能。
個人積分：662分
文章編號：66947911
個人積分：282分
文章編號：66947916
個人積分：662分
文章編號：66947997
個人積分：14964分
文章編號：66948027
個人積分：14964分
文章編號：66948082
