個人積分：24分
文章編號：11123715
個人積分：51分
文章編號：11123886
Raymond Lui wrote:No, it's not. As a programmer before and QA engineer right now, any program crash is related to it's (in this case, Safari) poor error handling.
As for the problem, I really would regard it as a site's problem instead of a browser's problem.
Move this question to a PC platform,
If Firefox or Chrome is crashing with Yahoo Taiwan and not yet Internet Explorer, would you regard it it problem of Firefox or Chrome or Yahoo Taiwan?
cjohnny_tai wrote:Really? Why is 3.0 beta still missing AVRCP w/ A2DP? Why USB tethering is still unstable? Apple is not anywhere better than MS in technology. (So do MS is not better than Apple in GUI and industrial design).
說真的oper在wm手機是好用多了,問題還是在微軟系統os不好用, 很多support以目前技術沒有一項是apple作不到,只是要不要作
cjohnny_tai wrote:It simply show you never use an WM before (or simply don't know how to use). All of them are running fine for my SE X1 (any my previous HTC Tytn II) before. I can watch youtube without problem Opera + Flashlite 3.1. I can run Java game smoothly and without problem. With Garmin Mobile Xt, IGO8, Tomtom7 (and a lot more), I don't see why it can't replace any PNA GPS device.
flash在一台手機如果像腦殘的htc用低階cpu加上很爛的os能用嗎?
有時在筆電上吋跑JAVA FLASH都太慢了,要一隻手機跑很順,是不是太不切實際
手機可以取代專業ＧＰＳ嗎？
cjohnny_tai wrote:Be open mind. Read the facts and don't be brainwashed.
如果有這種想法的人是手機在用你，而不是你在用手機
My SE X1 rom-> http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=471
個人積分：358分
文章編號：11124422
jackleung wrote:
Why is 3.0 beta still missing AVRCP w/ A2DP? Why USB tethering is still unstable?...(恕刪)
How do we actually know AVRCP is missing in 3.0?
Bluetooth in 3.0 can actually be used for game and peer to peer connection, I think it's only the matter or if 3rd party would write the program for it.
Quote from Apple website
Using the new External Accessory framework, your application can now communicate with "Made for iPod" hardware accessories attached to iPhone or iPod touch through either the 30-pin dock connector or wirelessly using Bluetooth.
And for tethering
it's because this function is not officially released yet (remember, it's only beta)
Apple wants to wait until AT&T and other carriers to allow and support it. (Apple said they were working on it)
C'est La Vie! 法文「這就是人生啊！」
個人積分：51分
文章編號：11124856
sickfoot wrote:AVRCP is common standard and is nothing new. If it cannot work w/ existing hardware that support AVRCP, then it's either not working or not support. Maybe Apple still working on that since 3.0 is still beta. Or maybe Apple is again creating new standard that render any existing hardware w/ AVRCP unusable.
How do we actually know AVRCP is missing in 3.0?
Bluetooth in 3.0 can actually be used for game and peer to peer connection, I think it's only the matter or if 3rd party would write the program for it.
Quote from Apple website
Using the new External Accessory framework, your application can now communicate with "Made for iPod" hardware accessories attached to iPhone or iPod touch through either the 30-pin dock connector or wirelessly using Bluetooth.
My SE X1 rom-> http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=471
個人積分：358分
文章編號：11125296
jackleung wrote:
AVRCP is c...(恕刪)
for the bluetooth hardware using in iphone 3G, it's no different from the other common cellphone. and 3.0 shows that A2DP can be used in iPhone 3G. Just Apple locked the function in previous version for the reason we don't know.
In addition, I thought you were talking about using AVRCP to control other bluetooth device.
But it seems like you were actually talking about A2DP headphone, or I misunderstood it?
C'est La Vie! 法文「這就是人生啊！」
個人積分：66分
文章編號：11129712
個人積分：358分
文章編號：11130498
個人積分：164分
文章編號：11131016
以 WM 的角度去看 iPhone 跟以 iPhone 的角度去看，都會覺得對方不好啦！
用慣微軟產品的人，當然覺得沒有 Office 就是不對，而且還指名要微軟牌的，其他的不能稱為 Office 軟體，只是相容品。
可是習慣 Linux 的人，可能會覺得，沒有原始碼可以自行編譯，總覺得怪怪的，不知軟體公司會動啥手腳？
這是 Apple 版，當然支持 iPhone 的人多，幫 iPhone 辯護的人也多，說 iPhone 怎樣怎樣的人，是不是也對自己的想法太過固執呢？況且。真要挑毛病，那個東西不是一堆毛病？
我記得有看過版友舉一個很有趣的例子：
那個 F1 賽車，既沒冷氣，又沒音響，不能跑山路，還只能坐一個人，車子貴且耗油，最糟糕的是連個車頂也沒有，碰到下雨天怎麼辦？這台基本上是個垃圾........
是啊！要是我也不考慮買這台車，當然我的考量點除了售價外，就是他的維修保養據點不夠普及啦！
回到正題，iPhone 對我而言，原廠的手機功能還不如隨便一隻 Nokia 手機，但是就我的角度，跟很多 PDA 相比，同樣是透過軟體就能提昇功能，但是 Apple 弄好了 App Store 的平台，找軟體在上面找，是比透過 Google 找方便多啦！
當然，這個其他公司，其他廠也打算作，不過，等作出來了，而且形成市場規模在來說嘴吧！
破
個人積分：168分
文章編號：11132164
個人積分：66分
文章編號：11132547
如果你还不知道车用导航应该是什么样子，我问问你GoogleMap上可以实现车头朝上地图随转吗？可以自动重新规划吗？可以语音提示吗？如果这些最为基础的东西都不具备，我该怎么导航？一边开车一边正着或者倒着看手机？
理论上买Apple产品的应该是精英人士见多识广，可种种迹象表明理论和实际差距甚大。
