個人非 BB 迷, 只是單純發問請教無評判的意圖.
請前輩釋疑
個人積分：9分
文章編號：37276858
個人積分：163分
文章編號：37276905
個人積分：0分
文章編號：37277165
個人積分：7分
文章編號：37277298
個人積分：168分
文章編號：37277698
個人積分：163分
文章編號：37283471
個人積分：0分
文章編號：37288968
個人積分：87分
文章編號：37289254
個人積分：0分
文章編號：37290368
個人積分：165分
文章編號：37290923
Crackberry的Kevin問了RIM的CEO:
If you've been following the news regarding BlackBerry 10, then you likely already know that the first BB10 device will be a full touchscreen, with the QWERTY version following close behind. This decision has shocked some people, making many wonder why RIM would go such a route when one of the most popular features of BlackBerry, and arguably one that RIM has perfected, is the QWERTY keyboard. When Kevin asked him about this decision, RIM CEO Thorsten Heins had this to say:
"There's two reasons for this. The first reason, without being arrogant, I think we own the full qwerty market. The Bold 9900 is doing a good job of this in the market with our corporate customers. In the US we're most under pressure with the BYOD movement in enterprises, so we need to get in the battle. That's why we need the entry card, which is the full touch device, so we can go to enterprises and say, hey look at this, this is the full touch from BlackBerry and it does things way better than what you have today. And I think it's going to be way better. And then the qwerty comes immediately thereafter."
"The second reason is technology. Building the full touch device on this platform is more complicated than the qwerty one. So it's natural that you make the more complex product first that actually clears the pipeline for the platform."
總之, 全螢幕跟有鍵盤的只是先後問題~
所以樓主問題應該是不成立!
