爽三將倒 wrote:
聽說球大是反指標，我...(恕刪)
原來他的反指標對奧斯卡也有用
個人積分：64538分
文章編號：42025858
個人積分：207分
文章編號：42026188
球德洛 wrote:
必須承認,整部片不難...(恕刪)
你要懂的是「隱喻」這二個字
不懂它，那你會錯過很多作品，不只電影
這是欣賞各種創作的必要修為之一
加油！
今天的洛杉磯時報的二段文字。不難懂的！
Number crunchers such as Nate Silver can bring their analytical skills to the Oscars, but statistics go only so far. "Lincoln" led the field with 12 nominations. However, unlike most nomination leaders, it couldn't seal the deal and win best picture or director because, for whatever reason, it didn't win voters' hearts. Too many motion picture academy members carped to us that watching it felt like "homework" or a "duty."
"Argo," on the other hand, with its triumphant rescue story of American hostages, left voters feeling good, particularly because the film's liberation scheme wouldn't have worked without the involvement of ... wait for it ... Hollywood. Hooray, indeed! And that standing ovation for "Life of Pi" director Ang Lee told you all you needed to know about the depth of the academy's feelings toward the filmmaker and his creation.
參考一下。
個人積分：35分
文章編號：42026283
個人積分：45分
文章編號：42027034
個人積分：35分
文章編號：42029885
個人積分：269分
文章編號：42033910
個人積分：5分
文章編號：42034975
個人積分：231分
文章編號：42035178
個人積分：22分
文章編號：42037332
個人積分：6分
文章編號：42043686
