個人積分：159分
文章編號：28954354
個人積分：4346分
文章編號：28955365
個人積分：159分
文章編號：28955425
個人積分：4346分
文章編號：28955545
個人積分：159分
文章編號：28955677
個人積分：4346分
文章編號：28956230
個人積分：159分
文章編號：28956345
個人積分：4346分
文章編號：28957613
chan15 wrote:
Hmm~ Altho...(恕刪)
I don't agree with you, but I also respect your judgement , in this case, the Taipei City Government to defend the people's legal rights , on the other hand, google to safeguard its own interests at the expense of the user's rights ...
This glory is worth the google?I don't think so ...
個人積分：6分
文章編號：28957814
個人積分：159分
文章編號：28964671
e36coupe wrote:
I don't ag...(恕刪)
First of all, Taipei government use a controversial law in this case, and take the wrong example, such as PCHome and Yahoo online shopping website, their software policy were not restricted by this rule, but Taipei government try to misunderstanding people.
Secondly, as I said, if Google can't decide to compromise with Taipei government's asking in a short time, stop the selling service is the best action that I can thought, and 24 hours to revise the code to let you use the software you paid, I think it's quite fast, although it's not pretty stable right now
well, nice to talk, let's see how it goes.
