Douchebag76 wrote:
都是用google photos...(恕刪)
還有人臉辨識，按一下搜尋就會看到
個人積分：892分
文章編號：78645929
個人積分：73分
文章編號：78647237
個人積分：225分
文章編號：78649599
個人積分：29696分
文章編號：78699339
個人積分：481分
文章編號：78704406
個人積分：1480分
文章編號：78705045
bravotiger wrote:
歐洲都開始對美國網路巨頭徵收數位稅了(恕刪)
其實不用舉些八竿子打不著的來試圖加強你這種的論點
數位稅的本意是補歐盟的錢坑，而非保護產業
講白了就是課不到這些跨國企業的稅，損失很慘重，心很痛
這歐盟發布的新聞稿內就可以得到驗證
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_2041
The challenge is to make the most of this trend, while ensuring that digital companies also contribute their fair share of tax. If not, there is a real risk to Member State public revenues: digital companies currently have an average effective tax rate half that of the traditional economy in the EU.
Today's proposals come as Member States seek permanent and lasting solutions to ensure a fair share of tax revenues from online activities, as urgently called for by EU leaders in October 2017. Profits made through lucrative activities, such as selling user-generated data and content, are not captured by today's tax rules. Member States are now starting to seek fast, unilateral solutions to tax digital activities, which creates a legal minefield and tax uncertainty for business. A coordinated approach is the only way to ensure that the digital economy is taxed in a fair, growth-friendly and sustainable way.
Pierre Moscovici, Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs added: “The digital economy is a major opportunity for Europe and Europe is a huge source of revenues for digital firms. But this win-win situation raises legal and fiscal concerns. Our pre-Internet rules do not allow our Member States to tax digital companies operating in Europe when they have little or no physical presence here. This represents an ever-bigger black hole for Member States, because the tax base is being eroded. That's why we're bringing forward a new legal standard as well an interim tax for digital activities.”
pchome相簿早在2002年就推出了
而google相簿是從收購Picasa(2004年)後再到google+模仿，最後在2015年獨立出來的服務
pc相簿早已經搶佔先機十多年，2005年的新聞稿還指出用戶約86萬，是網路相簿中的第一名
這樣一個第一名不思進取，反倒被後來的追過，還超前到讓他看不到車尾燈
這自己該好好檢討為什麼大眾會拋棄他們，而不是去扯外國企業扼殺或是談保護不保護
自由市場本來就該開放自由競爭，如果需要被保護才能存活，那只是在證明這家企業太弱了
除非身在中國、美國、歐洲這種大國，否則這種企業不可能光靠內需就撐起來
保護的功用也只是在保護內需市場而已，出去一樣死
看看車界被保護的納智捷成了什麼樣子，最終也只能黯然退出中國市場
個人積分：8832分
文章編號：78705395
個人積分：29696分
文章編號：78706730
個人積分：8832分
文章編號：78706931
