Conclusion - Pros
■ 28.2 MP backside illuminated sensor
■ Hybrid AF system with phase-detect points covering 90% of frame
■ 153 cross-type AF points with industry-leading frame coverage
■ Mostly effective subject tracking
■ High quality 4K video performance
■ 4K 4:2:0 8-bit video out
■ Outstanding dynamic range and low light image quality
■ Bright OLED viewfinder with essentially no lag
■ 15 fps burst shooting
■ Touch screen
■ Built-in Wi-Fi
■ H.265 video codec
Conclusion - Cons
■ Lens family is limited at this time
■ Best AF performance limited to select lenses
■ Autofocus is less predictable in low light
■ Overly aggressive Jpeg noise reduction
■ No true live view during burst shooting
■ Noisy high-ISO video
■ Onerous procedure for downloading support software
■ H.265 video codec
* Image quality (jpeg)
* Low light / high ISO performance
以上這兩項分數偏低(甚至輸 X-T1 / GX7),所以代表JPEG機身直出比較不OK是吧....(這表示NX500也是...)
yellowflood wrote:
DxO評論...(恕刪)
DX0的分數不準
看看就好
SONY感光有對DXO最佳化,分數都會好很多(對岸有講解文,忘了在哪)
舉例來說
我也有玩M43的
DXO分數,GX7高ISO分數比2~3年前的G3還差,光這點用過這兩台的人應該知道GX7跟G3完全不同等級差太多竟然還輸,這分數有多離譜
反而EPM2和EM5用SONY感光分數比GX7大好幾百分(EPM2分數還比EM5高)
我有GX7和EPM2,平時用起來就明顯GX7 高ISO比EPM2好
實際外國評測,GX7高ISO和色彩還原度都比EM5好,OKYMPUS ISO還有灌水
所以說DXO分數看看就好
不用蒐集七龍珠,健達出奇蛋,一次滿足你三個願望