Galaxy S4 相機小贏 HTC One

y78912321 wrote:
不知嘴硬的是誰三星說...(恕刪)

this7777 wrote:
這篇看到這裡發現很多...(恕刪)

frensel wrote:
我: 三星拍照勝HTC
你: 三星的體感沒用啦~

於是HTC的拍照就勝了?

frensel wrote:
我: 三星拍照勝HT...(恕刪)

Youhimher wrote:
GSMArena網站比01還狠 每篇留言都要備審核過才能po出 我剛的留言就被拒絕了 內容如下:

this review is incredibly biased:
- scale one's photo to 13mp to compare with s4's picture?
- no indoor night shot comparison?
- s4's screen is better only because its bigger and has better sunlight eligibility? is there no merit in ppi and color accuracy? (螢幕大跟太陽下的反光較低就決定螢幕比較好? 解析度跟色準算什麼? 目前沒讀到htc one在太陽下的反光有大到有感)
- Touchwiz is better because it looks more like stock android? you must mean froyo stock, since even ex-samsung employee criticized TW to look like froyo


是實上已經有些人看出相機的評比是不公平的 但我想一些比較直接質問的留言(like mine)沒有被po出

http://www.gsmarena.com/reviewcomm-913.php

frensel wrote:
- scale one's photo to 13mp to compare with s4's picture?
人家在比細節呢, htc one確是遠遠不如

pipiword wrote:
外國的月亮比較圓
米...(恕刪)

frensel wrote:
你不知道gsmare...(恕刪)

frensel wrote:
- s4's screen is better only because its bigger and has better sunlight eligibility? is there no merit in ppi and color accuracy? (螢幕大跟太陽下的反光較低就決定螢幕比較好? 解析度跟色準算什麼? 目前沒讀到htc one在太陽下的反光有大到有感)
440和460ppi根本人眼看上去沒分別, 有甚麼好比? S4提供動態多種色準調整, 看電影時可提高對比度, 看網頁時又可以把螢幕自動調得比較白(6900K左右, 去看Phonearena的錄像評測就可以發現S4和One一樣白), 不差ONE多少, 而One無法做任何調整. One螢幕只有4.7", 也不如S4
- Touchwiz is better because it looks more like stock android? you must mean froyo stock, since even ex-samsung employee criticized TW to look like froyo
S4的Android版本更新, 可調整功能更多, 自然勝One, 你別再斷章取義了

y78912321 wrote:
都說啦..硬把400...(恕刪)