看了這篇友站的文跟討論
本來覺得鳥鳥的SIII 我好像誤會它了
jay_chen0628 wrote:
http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/4523/4769979/1/1/116288/
看了這篇友站的文跟討論
本來覺得鳥鳥的SIII 我好像誤會它了
7.相機:兩者的像素一樣。SGS3 使用 S5C73M3 BSI 感光元件。HOX 使用三星的 S5K3H2YX 感光元件,此元件和 SGS2 是同一感光元件。HTC 的最大光圈是 2.0, 而 SGS3 則是光圈 2.6,鏡頭 3.7mm,最小ISO是 80, 而 SGS3 是使用最新的感光元件。
實際比較請參考原文:SGS3的效果明顯比 SGS2的感光元件好很多。HOX 多了軟體的修正。
比較讓人驚訝的是 HOX 是採用了和 SGS2 一模一樣的感光元件。而感光元件又決定了相片畫質的九成因素。
註:以下是xda原文
-------------------
7] Camera: Both cameras look same. Nothing much known about the sensor SGS3 uses. It's S5C73M3 BSI sensor. Whereas HOX uses the Samsung sensor S5K3H2YX. This was one of sensors in SGS2. HOX has the same sensor used in SGS2. F stop is much better in HTC -- 2 compared to 2.6 in SGS3. But that's just one part of story. We have to check the sensor capabilities. Like I mentioned HTC is using the sensor from SGS2, and SGS3 uses a brand new sensor. And HOX never proved to be best shooter even before the SGS3 launch.
HOX review from GSMarena: The first two charts play to the One X strengths and shows it as a good shooter, though still not the best in the 8MP game. The third chart shows good too, but also some artifacts due to the sub-optimal processing of the One X.
There are other novelties associated with both shooters -- burst mode, best pic, scene selection. It's virtually same here.
Edit: Thanks to another XDA member Netman_ , we have few more details on the SGS3 picture quality. It's much improved compared to SGS2.
Few full resolution shots from SGS3 camera here: 1, 2 and 3
Comparison shots from SGS2: here and here
Exif data shows minimum ISO of 80, 3.7mm lens and F-stop of 2.6
EDIT: Camera can be activated through voice actions (S Voice). It can also take a picture by shouting "cheese".
danieliememe wrote:
在S3則是多了透過Wifi通訊的[AllShare Cast 無線分享設備],能夠HDMI輸出至自家有支援HDMI的影音裝置上
...(恕刪)