bluestaral wrote:
我是兩種都用過的人這...(恕刪)
最怕的就是無法客觀看待啊(也不太可能客觀..)
所以手機還是自己用的爽就好
人比人氣死人~~~
個人積分：2分
文章編號：43964974
個人積分：5分
文章編號：43965226
個人積分：56分
文章編號：43965247
個人積分：409分
文章編號：43965299
個人積分：409分
文章編號：43965368
個人積分：409分
文章編號：43965405
個人積分：0分
文章編號：43965471
如果有耐心看完原文出處下面眾網友的稱讚, 或質疑, 或挑戰. 你會發現沒有一篇明示或暗示三星金錢萬能的文章.
話說, By Lars Rehm (23 hours ago):
The HTC One's photosite size is comparable to that of a 'enthusiast compact camera' such as the Panasonic LX 7. However, sensor size itself is still the same as on any other smartphone, i.e. the total light gathering capability is no different.
( 其實HTC one 進光量是一樣的. )
又, By d3xmeister (1 day ago)
That's, right, you can put full frame pixels in a 2MP camera phone, the image will be camera phone quality, maybe even worse.
Sensor size is what matter, to put it simply to you: What amount of light is used to produce the photo ? If you take a half sensor for example, it will capture about half of the amount of light. You can make it 1MP, it will actually make the photo worse, since resolution does matter when it comes to image quality, and the amount of light captured will still be half.
( .....解析度終究會影響畫質 )
不知各位是否認同?
個人積分：6分
文章編號：43965507
個人積分：5分
文章編號：43965510
)
個人積分：6分
文章編號：43965597
