夾森 wrote:
版上的先進們,首先感...(恕刪)
其實把這個燒機油的問題當作科學來研究也是值得敬佩的, 剛才也學車友google了一下"2.0T oil consumption", 才知道我們在討論的議題, 外國也討論N遍了, 令人感到莞爾的, 是一樣的"討論內容"也在國外網站出現, 例如:
http://forums.audiworld.com/showthread.php?t=2797929
裡面的一段話:
Many of their 2.0Ts consume oil, it's just a matter of how much. Audi told me that 1 quart per 1200 miles was "normal" and published as such by Audi. So I asked, "How many miles do I get between oil changes?".
They said, "about 5000".
I asked, "How many quarts does the engine hold?"
Dealer said, "about 5 quarts."
I said, "5000 miles divided by 1200 miles equals just over 4 quarts of oil consumed between oil changes. Should I come in with less than 1 quart of oil?"
Dealer had a blank look on their face and said, "No, you can bring it in to top-off when the oil light is on."
I said, "so you want me to come in every 1200 miles and get topped off until the oil change?" They said, yes if needed.
I jokingly stated, "well, I should never need an oil change since it's constantly being burned off." They weren't laughing.
這跟我之前提的疑問一樣, 即便是"正常", 總還是讓人感到不正常...
我還是第一次聽到"去死團"這樣的說法, 剛才wiki了一下何謂"去死團", 還真有點一頭霧水當今的網路術語是如此的豐富....
我對Audi好感度不錯的, 也正因為是如此, 所以才會對無意中發現這樣的問題而感到大吃一驚, 並且對於原廠的回覆方式更是大吃一驚, 所以想要求證這件事的真實性. 經過討論與搜尋後, 我了解目前即便是Audi總廠都也只能讓車主用"自行吞下去"這帖良藥, 我想, 再多的討論也無濟於事了, 對於2.0T的苦主來說, 幫不上忙, 頂多是傷口上灑鹽, 而對於其他非苦主的Audi車主來說, 又何嘗不是對於心理面喜愛的品牌蒙上了一層灰?
設身處地地去想一下, 也可以理解幾位車友的不滿反應了. 不過只要不淪為人身攻擊的謾罵, 討論都是能得到正面效果的, 退一萬步, 至少讓即將打算買2.0T的車主可以心理有所準備了吧?
PS: 身為雷諾車主, 我也經常投書到法國雷諾以及Renault FB幹譙台灣總代理的不是, 車廠做不好都是要罵的, 消費者不應該沉默...
共勉之!
