新加坡冷回馬斯克:電動車並不環保,那只是一種生活方式

PlantariS wrote:
今年九月已經20萬輛 算一下應該政府也花了超過50億 然後只有笑果?...(恕刪)


今年空氣比去年好多了,不管是直接感受或數據統計。
電動車也可以很耐用emoving里程5萬公里達標
wgyang00 wrote:
關鍵是在新加坡, 你...(恕刪)

你去看看新加坡的税,對於電動車還是有給予免稅或減稅的優惠措施。所以別被誤導。
PlantariS wrote:

事實上去年九月已1...(恕刪)

你連補助不會永遠一直下去都不知道?第一天來電動車版的嗎?
cbeck wrote:
今年空氣比去年好多了...(恕刪)

連真的入秋都還沒有 你就可以感受到冬天的空氣
真是騎了電車考試都一百分 好棒棒
btip8317 wrote:
新聞連結特斯拉一直在...(恕刪)


溫室效應基本上沒救了

地球上人越多

畜牧業就只會一直往上成長(碳排放最大來源)
Wow_Senior wrote:
首先呢,你好好看看整...(恕刪)



PM 2.5 和 碳排放是兩碼子事
前者對人體健康危害很大
後者是溫室效應的主因(環保)

下圖是台灣CO2排放來源

bartholomew.simpson wrote:
這篇稍微看一下是很典.

鋰電池 回收率<5% 是很舊的資料 ..
..(恕刪)


你的回文 TL:DR
而且完全沒有任何依據 (就憑你的一張嘴)

建議用GOOGLE WIKI 或者回學校多念點書, 不要"誤導"其他人好嗎?
還是你用說的 比別人登在報紙 網站上的更有權威 更可信? 你以為你是誰?

麻煩自己google 下列關鍵字

台灣燃煤發電比例
燃煤發電汙染
electric car carbon footprint


我只要用下列這兩段話打你臉就好了 (你說: 鋰電池 回收率<5% 是很舊的資料)

Battery recycling (from WIKI)

As of 2019, the recycling of Li-Ion batteries in most cases does not extract lithium since lithium-ion battery technology continuously changes and processes to recycle these batteries can thus be outdated in a couple of years.[10] Another reason why it isn't being done on a large scale is because the extraction of lithium from old batteries is 5x more expensive than mined lithium[11]. However, it is already being done on a small scale (by some companies[12][13][14][5]), an industry in expectation of large quantities of disused batteries to come.[15][16][17][6]

Energy saving and effective recycling solutions for lithium-ion batteries can reduce the carbon footprint of the production of lithium-ion batteries significantly[18][6] .


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s time to get serious about recycling lithium-ion batteries
A projected surge in electric-vehicle sales means that researchers must think about conserving natural resources and addressing battery end-of-life issues

by Mitch Jacoby
JULY 14, 2019 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 97, ISSUE 28

In Australia, for example, only 2–3% of Li-ion batteries are collected and sent offshore for recycling, according to Naomi J. Boxall, an environmental scientist at Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). The recycling rates in the European Union and the US—less than 5%—aren’t much higher.
btip8317 wrote:
新聞連結特斯拉一直在...(恕刪)


不喜歡電動機車的其中一個原因
是因為你們的補助金是我們納的稅
Wow_Senior wrote:新聞標題斷章取義.連...(恕刪)


蓋大樓一下

不然都被其他沒看懂的留言給淹沒

結論:

電動公共交通 (如捷運、電動公車) > 燃油公共交通 > 電動私家車 (如Tesla) > 燃油私家車
PlantariS wrote:
連真的入秋都還沒有 ...(恕刪)


1、2月也算今年冬天
電動車也可以很耐用emoving里程5萬公里達標
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 30)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!