美國海軍在南海實戰軍演攻擊和摧毀多處小島

《美國海軍在南海實戰軍演攻擊和摧毀多處小島》

4架攜帶核武的B-52轟炸機分別配合在東海和南海的實戰演習!

注:強拆進入倒數計時!

美國海軍在南海實戰軍演攻擊和摧毀多處小島

美國海軍在南海實戰軍演攻擊和摧毀多處小島

解放軍:快撿石頭到海邊丟美艦
有夢最美,希望相隨,祝小綠綠們的白日夢早日成真!

catherin wrote:
《美國海軍在南海實...(恕刪)


倒计时?到是给个时间啊,不会让我等到地球灭亡那个时候吧?

catherin wrote:
《美國海軍在南海實...(恕刪)


南海那幾個人工島嶼只有戰術價值

美軍真的要攻擊
半天就可以拿下來了

空壓彈丟個幾顆
人就死光.島也沒了
還不需要用到核武

機場跑道剛好留給美軍戰機起降

Vincent@nikon wrote:
人一綠 腦就殘...(恕刪)


美國海軍在南海實戰軍演,跟藍綠有關?
這次轟炸明顯是預演,摧毀中共在南海的軍事化人工島礁,這些島礁嚴重威脅台灣海運要道。
按中共內部資訊顯示,這是武統時封鎖台灣的重要關鍵,美國應該聽到了也行動了。
每次軍購繳的保護費,值啊!
你的標題有問題

不是在南海喔

是在日本的島與加州海岸

【the island of Iejima】&【on the California coast】


原文

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201903211073437964-South-China-Sea-Showdown-USMC-Island-Hopping/

As South China Sea Showdown Heats Up, US Marines Revisit Island-Hopping Strategy

22:04 21.03.2019

With relations between China and Western powers in the South China Sea showing little sign of cooling down, the US Marine Corps has decided to refresh its island-hopping skills, practicing storming an island in Japan last week and on the California coast this week.

Several USMC units "attacked" the island of Iejima last week, establishing a beachhead, seizing the island's airfield and shuttling in heavier assets to strike more enemy positions. Iejima is one of the Ryukyu Islands and sits just a few kilometers off the coast of Okinawa. The small island houses a US Marine Corps auxiliary facility.

US Air Force's B-52 Bombers Patrol South China Sea for Second Time in March
"This entire mission profile simulated the process of securing advanced footholds for follow-on forces to conduct further military operations, with rapid redeployment," the Corps said in a statement to Business Insider, which notes the drill was part of the Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations strategy — basically a modern-day approach to the island-hopping strategy that the US used during World War II to seize small islands in the Pacific Ocean defended by the Japanese Empire.

"It is critical for us to be able to project power in the context of China, and one of the traditional missions of the Marine Corps is seizing advanced bases," Marine Corps Gen. Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Congress last week. "If you look at the island chains and so forth in the Pacific as platforms from which we can project power, that would be a historical mission for the Marine Corps and one that is very relevant in a China scenario."

"I would just say that the United States military's had a lot of experience in the Western Pacific taking down small islands," Lieutenant General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., the Pentagon's Joint Staff director, said last May during a Pentagon press conference when prompted about the challenges China's islands posed.

"Taking down small islands that are isolated" is a "core competency," McKenzie said, cautioning that one "shouldn't read anything more into that than a simple statement of historical fact."


However, China's tiny reclaimed atolls and islets aren't quite the sea fortresses the Japanese turned their small islands scattered across the Pacific into. A quick survey of three islands the US attacked in World War II indicates they have areas much bigger than any South China Sea islet: Peleliu (five square miles), Tarawa (12 square miles) and Iwo Jima (eight square miles).

The USS Decatur (left) swerved to avoid the Chinese warship, PRC 170 (right) in the South China Sea on September 30
© PHOTO : U.S. NAVY
‘Ram It’: Chinese Colonel Offers Solution to US Ships Transiting South China Sea
By comparison, the area of the largest South China Sea islands includes Woody Island (one square mile), Mischief Reef (2.1 square miles), Taiping Island (0.04 square miles) and Fiery Cross Reef (one square mile). That excludes, of course, Hainan, by far the largest, but also totally uncontested as a Chinese province.

However, US forces seeking to attack those islands would also have to contend with the long-range anti-ship missiles the Chinese People's Liberation Army has placed on many of the larger islands, including those named above — a challenge US forces in the 1940s didn't face.

On March 12, the US Navy's Expeditionary Combat Command kicked off the joint Exercise Pacific Blitz 2019 in southern California. During the drills, which last until March 26, US Navy forces supported Marines by "by establishing theater logistics through the development of advanced naval bases," according to a Monday Navy press release.

Taiwan Navy's Perry-class frigate launches an ASROC (anti-submarine rocket) during the annual Han Kuang military exercises.
© AP PHOTO / WALLY SANTANA
As Taiwan Plans Live-Fire Drills in South China Sea, US Urges More Weapons Buys
"The NEF [Navy Expeditionary Forces] will be conducting field training exercises which include military base construction and maintenance, expeditionary medical facility construction and maintenance, port security, expeditionary rapid airfield damage repair, port damage assessment and repair, support to undersea warfare and expeditionary ordnance reload," the statement says.

"When you consider today's threats, it is all about maintaining a ready force that can move rapidly into congested domains," Marine Expeditionary Forces commander Lt. Gen. Joseph L. Osterman said in a Marine Corps statement on Wednesday. "The future fight is going to require us to leverage a Marine land component as part of our larger goal of sea control. We must train to make time sensitive decisions in the face of uncertainty."

"The US Navy and Marine Corps are a team, and joint training like Pacific Blitz allows our team to improve our capability to conduct amphibious operations," said Vice Adm. John D. Alexander, commander of the 3rd Fleet. "In the current maritime environment here in the Pacific, joint partnerships and power projection are key to maintaining free and open sea lanes."
記得美國人說南海根本沒有島哦
只有太平礁

連島都沒有又怎麼攻島

nomo333 wrote:
你的標題有問題不是...(恕刪)


轰炸机来也是给歼二零送人头
其實南沙群島各島易攻難守,只要有油氣彈的重武器,都可以摧毀守軍,不管是太平島,永興島,這是客觀事實,美國有能力,中共也有,我們也有
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!