涉台兵推慘敗 紐時:遠程武力投送與澳核潛艇壓不住中國 也保不了台灣

負責研發與工程的
美國國防部前任副部長Michael Griffin說

中國大陸新的洲際高超音速武器
可以攻擊全世界任何地方的美軍船隻

應該是指航母吧
才有攻擊的價值

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NATIONAL SECURITY

Behind murky claim of a new hypersonic missile test, there lies a very real arms race

https://www.npr.org/2021/10/20/1047384050/behind-murky-claim-of-a-new-hypersonic-missile-test-there-lies-a-very-real-arms-

October 20, 202112:16 PM ET

China's DF-17 missile is a medium-range hypersonic weapon capable of traveling over five times the speed of sound.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
It began with what appeared to be a missing rocket. In July, the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology announced the 77th launch of one of its Long March 2C rockets; in late August it announced the 79th. What happened to launch No. 78?

According to an article in the Financial Times this past weekend, it was a secret test of a powerful new kind of hypersonic missile.

"The simplest way to imagine this new weapon system is to imagine the space shuttle, put a nuclear weapon in the cargo bay and then don't bother with the landing gear," says Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. This hypersonic weapon launches briefly into orbit, "and it glides back to Earth just like the space shuttle, except for when it gets where it's going, it goes boom."

The new weapon would be significant because it could attack the U.S. from an unexpected direction, such as the South Pole. The United States' missile defenses and early-warning radars are pointed toward the North Pole, the standard route for intercontinental ballistic missiles, so the country would be vulnerable to a strike from the opposite direction.

The Defense Department would not comment on the report, and a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said it was an experimental spacecraft, not a weapon.

"I could believe either version of this story," says James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "I could believe this was a weapons test, or I could believe it was a test of a reusable space vehicle."

China's threat perceptions
But regardless of whether the weapon is real, China has been investing heavily in shorter-range hypersonic missiles. These skim through the upper atmosphere at more than five times the speed of sound and can also change direction during flight. Those properties give China an important advantage against missile defenses, says Tong Zhao, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Endowment in Beijing. "Given the capability for hypersonic missiles to maneuver during flight and given their rather fast speed, they can better penetrate missile defense systems," he says.

Zhao says that China sees U.S. missile defenses as a major threat. It has been building up its stockpile of shorter-range hypersonic weapons, which can be armed with either a nuclear or a conventional warhead. This new longer-distance weapon, if it was in fact tested, fits into that pattern.


The U.S. Navy regularly patrols the western Pacific Ocean. Some worry that it is vulnerable to attack from China's hypersonic missiles.
Navy Media Content Services
Zhao says that in the big picture, Chinese leadership wants to protect itself from what it sees as growing U.S. aggression: "China feels it needs a greater overall military power, including a stronger nuclear power, to basically ensure that the U.S. wouldn't be able to interfere with Chinese internal matters."

An emerging arms race
But not everyone agrees that China's buildup of hypersonic weapons is defensive. Michael Griffin, a former undersecretary of defense for research and engineering who is now co-president of Logiq Inc., says China's hypersonic arsenal allows it to expand its influence in the region.

"One can target airfields and aircraft carriers, within 15 or 20 minutes of flight time, literally thousands of kilometers away from the Chinese mainland," he says. Griffin adds that the new intercontinental hypersonic missile could take that capability a step further. With or without a nuclear warhead, such weapons could potentially strike U.S. ships anywhere on Earth. "That is a really big deal," he says.

Even the existing shorter-range weapons put the U.S., which is trying to expand its military presence in the western Pacific, and its allies at risk, he argues. Griffin says that the U.S. needs to develop and stockpile hypersonic missiles of its own to counter the Chinese threat. "I'm not one to mince words — it is an arms race," Griffin says. "And critically, we didn't start it."

But Acton questions whether the current race for hypersonic weapons makes sense. China already has a sizable medium-range ballistic missile force that is very capable, he notes. China's intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) are already more than capable of overwhelming U.S. defenses, and its ICBM force is growing. "I don't think this is carefully driven by rational strategic factors," says Acton. "I think a lot of this is driven by keeping up with the neighbors."

Lewis says any race is supposed to have a finish line. This arms race is more like the two sides are on treadmills. "The only victory is to be first off the treadmill," he says. "So what we need to do is to find a way to exit the arms race, rather than accelerate it."

One way to do that, he believes, is for the U.S. to be more open to limits on missile defenses, which are driving the hypersonic craze. "Over the long term, I think we have to think about what kind of arms control we want with Russia and China," he says.

If the latest reports of this nuclear-capable, long-range Chinese weapon are true, the race seems to be speeding up for now. And the Pentagon is doing what it can to keep pace. Last month, it successfully tested its own advanced hypersonic design.

For Acton, the growing tensions and lack of dialogue between the U.S. and China are far more concerning than whether China has developed a new weapon: "I'm frankly indifferent as to whether the nuclear warhead that fries me is carried by a ballistic missile or by a glider."
~水瓶~ wrote:
我們前些時候的兵推可(恕刪)


那是代表那次(兵推)我們可以擊退來犯的敵軍,打破土共國的美夢。
兵推本來就是模擬。又不是真的打!
當然,我們在抵禦外侮的時候,有朋友要來幫助你一起打土共,需要拒絕嗎?
我們又不是要侵略土共,我們只是在保衛台灣,假設本來55開,有朋友的幫助變成
73或甚至於82開,當然歡迎啦!

對土共國需要客氣嗎?
1969
[拇指向上]
shaupenhauer456
中美在台灣島大戰一場,把台灣打成一片廢墟,然後中美再坐下來談,就如同朝鮮戰場一樣。這樣你們這些綠蛙都徹底滿意了吧!戰後打算到哪國去當難民啊?[冷笑]
美國在阿拉斯加的
遠程高超音速武器測試失敗
主要是因為火箭有問題


殲20S首次曝光


網路消息
艦載機
殲35首飛成功
推特消息
WS-15版的殲20
試飛進行了垂直爬升
航天科工首次驗證RBCC組合循環發動機的飛行

stever2018
網路消息j20能夠發射武器,能夠證實?
nomo333
不是有夜間發射的照片,用紅外線攝影機拍的
快舟火箭的超級工廠完工

快舟火箭可以大量快速發射監視衛星
可以快速補充被擊毀的監視衛星

nomo333 wrote:
負責研發與工程的美國(恕刪)


我來解釋一下這個為什麼是更可怕的航母殺手。

之前東風導彈,主要是彈道攻擊,導彈在發射時會被美國辛苦建立,耗費大量國力的預警系統測知,除了發射飛彈在彈道攔截點攔截之外,航母得到訊息,會做掙扎性加速彎曲航行,避開至少是十幾分鐘後的導彈攻擊。

但這次的軌道攻擊武器就不一樣了。

無法預先得知攻擊目標,軌道飛行器噴出飛彈,數分鐘就擊中目標,毫無反應時間。這是美國驚懼的原因。
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 13)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!