F16好袖珍

Gugugu wrote:
怎麼老轉貼謠言呢

洛馬有說過92年嗎
...(恕刪)

joshpls wrote:
就是洛馬說的，謝謝再聯絡，慢走不送。

America's Lethal F-16 Fighter Jet Could Fly for 92 Years (In Theory)
http://nationalinterest.org/blog...(恕刪)

Gugugu wrote:洛馬什麼時後改名叫國家利益(nationalinterest.org)

一個謠言引用另一個謠言，年輕人都亂傳網路資料不會分辨
..(恕刪)

joshpls wrote:
喔！原來國家利益雜誌登的是謠言呀！？
這段看不懂嗎？

“The successful completion of this phase of full-scale durability testing demonstrates that this aircraft was built to last,” Susan Ouzts, vice president of Lockheed’s F-16 program, said in the press release....(恕刪)

joshpls wrote:
喔！原來老牌「國家利益雜誌」登的是謠言呀！？...(恕刪)

Gugugu wrote:THE BUZZ意思剛好就是"耳語"
怎麼就有人當正式文章一傳再傳

...(恕刪)

Gugugu wrote:長這麼大還看不懂媒體招數
要不要偶直接告訴你真相？
...(恕刪)

joshpls wrote:
比耐用，右邊那一架才會哭昏在廁所。
以色列空軍的F16AB，飛了33.5萬小時才退役，挪威空軍的F16也都飛了1萬小時。

joshpls wrote:
軍武沒半撇，抹黑滿行的。
請找出我轉BUZZ農場網站的帖來！...(恕刪)

joshpls wrote:
就是洛馬說的，謝謝再聯絡，慢走不送。
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/americas-lethal-f-16-fighter-jet-could-fly-92-years-theory-14290

iantsai74 wrote:
33.5萬小時？你確...(恕刪)