turtlins wrote:
看你這棟都沒人回，有(恕刪)
PTT去洗地沒
個人積分：1655分
文章編號：81601964
個人積分：15分
文章編號：81700982
個人積分：4707分
文章編號：81701958
個人積分：15分
文章編號：81702201
個人積分：98分
文章編號：81702248
個人積分：2777分
文章編號：81702267
個人積分：4905分
文章編號：81702461
ppopp747 wrote:
全台灣媒體都死光了?
國際機構單位鑒定蔡英文的學生紀錄表是偽造的，上面有4種筆跡加上2處經過塗改後重新覆寫
(恕刪)
您把LSE的 博士學位說成是 "彭主播" 頒發的 ?
"彭主播" 說不是就不是 ?
國際機構單位 說不是就不是 ?
明明 倫敦政經學院證實 蔡英文1984年獲頒法學博士無誤
https://www.lse.ac.uk/News/Latest-news-from-LSE/2019/j-October-2019/LSE-statement-on-PhD-of-Dr-Tsai-Ing-wen
LSE has received a number of queries regarding the academic status of our alumna, Dr Tsai Ing-wen, President of Taiwan.
We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London - the degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was correctly awarded a PhD in Law in 1984.
All degrees from that period were awarded via the University of London and the thesis would have been sent first to their Senate House Library.
The Senate House Library records confirm that a copy was received and sent by them to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS). There is a listing of Dr Tsai’s thesis ‘Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions’ in the IALS index document “Legal Research in the United Kingdom 1905-1984”, which was published in 1985.
Dr Tsai recently provided the LSE Library with a facsimile of a personal copy of the thesis, Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions which is available to view in the Library Reading Room. We understand Dr Tsai has also provided a digital version of her personal copy to the National Central Library of Taiwan.
學生紀錄表 是 LSE 所記載的 , LSE要怎麼改就怎麼改 , 和 國際機構單位 有什麼關係 ??
學生紀錄表不是 國際機構單位 寫的 , 更不是 國際機構單位 發的
國際機構單位鑒定蔡英文的學生紀錄表是偽造的，無法否定是 LSE 所記載的
上面有4種筆跡加上2處經過塗改後重新覆寫 , 無法否定是 LSE 所記載的, 更無法證明是偽造的
這些根本就不是 LSE 自己出來說的 , 反而 LSE 是證實的
錯誤使用萊布尼茲定律 ? 這是一種 形式謬誤 , 蒙面人謬誤（masked man fallacy），是不當代換指涉對象造成的錯誤推論。
根本不影響 倫敦政經學院證實 蔡英文1984年獲頒法學博士
個人積分：4707分
文章編號：81702676
個人積分：372分
文章編號：81702680
herblee wrote:
https://www.lse.ac.uk/News/Latest-news-from-LSE/2019/j-October-2019/LSE-statement-on-PhD-of-Dr-Tsai-Ing-wen
https://www.lse.ac.uk/lse-information/terms-of-use
2.7 We are a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties and users of the internet. Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers, or other information or content expressed or made available by third parties, including information providers, or users, are those of the authors or distributors and not of us. We do not necessarily endorse nor are we responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any opinion, advice or statement made on the Website.
個人積分：4905分
文章編號：81702793
sunhm wrote:
other information or content expressed or made available by third parties, including information providers, or users, are those of the authors or distributors and not of us
third parties ? 『third parties』should not be confused with "us" ???
third parties 當然不是 us
再度 錯誤使用萊布尼茲定律 ? 不當代換指涉對象? 造成對上方的"Terms of use"做出錯誤推論。
上面的 聲明就是 LSE statement
We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London - the degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was correctly awarded a PhD in Law in 1984.
