有關同性婚姻的民法修正草案

過客4112 wrote:
那麼個人覺得您的焦...(恕刪)

攝影機車堡 wrote:



所以我用?阿 ...(恕刪)

Best 3C wrote:
其實這字面上來看
小弟真的覺得感到惋惜

違反生物界常態這句話實在不恰當
以前不說不代表沒有
常態是什麼？
常態是指不同的時空、環境經由『人類』記錄、實驗、測試等...出現的一種表準
對錯並不能達到肯定
所以怎麼又會說是違反呢？

再者小弟不知道同志朋友有沒有執著於非要有個小孩
但這個權利至少先開啟
讓想要有小孩的可以公開公正的去領養小孩
當然不想要領養的，就不用特別擔心
如果你兒子跟你說他是同志
你會回他說：兒子，你違反了生物界的常態，不要執著去領養小孩

兩人世界當然可以是家庭
但是每個人對於家庭的定義不同
並不能用主觀的定義去要求別人接受

攝影機車堡 wrote:
既然不是孤兒 在這...(恕刪)

Lightwave18 wrote:
請問你用的是最新資...(恕刪)

shinxz wrote:
In response to misinterpretations that the American Psychiatric Association considers pedophilia a sexual orientation because of wording in its printed DSM-5 manual, which distinguishes between paraphilia and what it calls "paraphilic disorder", subsequently forming a division of "pedophilia" and "pedophilic disorder", the association commented: "'[S]exual orientation' is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read 'sexual interest.'" They added, "In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a 'paraphilia,' not a 'sexual orientation.' This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual." They said they strongly support efforts to criminally prosecute those who sexually abuse and exploit children and adolescents, and "also support continued efforts to develop treatments for those with pedophilic disorder with the goal of preventing future acts of abuse."[27]

紅字翻譯：因此美國精神病學協會認定戀童癖是一種性傾向(恕刪)

Rillifane wrote:
你的英文是體育老師教...(恕刪)

shinxz wrote:
我已經很明確地指出...(恕刪)