聯航機位超賣逼乘客下機濺血拖離「華裔男」

TD4 wrote:
乘客購買的是服務，不適用租賃關係的各項權利

TD4 wrote:
比如說某航突然倒閉停開

Laura CY wrote:

UA - the problem with 3411 was not "overbooking" nor "re-accommodating" so please stop with the phony apologies. What you SHOULD be apologizing for is:

1) treating human beings like meaningless animals that dared to inconvenience your staff
2) penalizing a paying customer for YOUR poor planning
3) lacking a logistics plan for a common scenario
4) using local police as your "heavies" to carry out your bidding and then shifting all the blame over to them **police should be used to keep your customers safe, NOT to intimidate them**
5) never hesitating to ask for a "doctor on board" to help for a medical emergency but giving zero respect to a doctor trying to get home to care for his patients
6) forcing children and adults to witness completely unnecessary physical brutality as if we live in some totalitarian regime: better do it UA's way or else...

This was YOUR mistake - skip the PR bs with your empty buzzwords any take some accountability.

As an MD myself, I'm terrified to ever fly with you again... god forbid if I was traveling and needed to get back to the hospital without worrying about my physical safety.

Shame on you.

Connie Wegner Ratley wrote:
My Husband is also a Doctor in a Hospital and puts in 15-20 hr days. He has in 15 years never missed a shift and really can't .

TD4 wrote:
我蠻確定如果航空公司不想載你，你卻堅持不下機的話
長的再白也一樣會被架下去

vivian93 wrote:
有沒有權那要看拒絕...(恕刪)

TD4 wrote:
乘客有權要求航空公司賠償，但是無權拒絕執法人員離開的命令
航空公司可能有錯，也可能條款中有保留任意調度或取消服務的權力
但是任何乘客都不能拒絕接受警察離開飛機的要求
更不可能命令警察必須當場開庭，把事情弄清楚後再作決定
航警執行這種公權力關係到飛航安全，不管你是機位糾紛還是什麼理由
只要機組人員要求，他們就得把人弄走

TD4 wrote:
只要機組人員要求，他們就得把人弄走