turtlins wrote:
哈哈哈～
彭主播該去看醫生，
你們相信的人也可以一起去看啦。
教育部改口 否認封存
你在說這一集吧!?
22萬人觀看!
哈哈哈～
20幾萬人一起去看醫生!?
個人積分：372分
文章編號：81061010
個人積分：30124分
文章編號：81061158
個人積分：394分
文章編號：81062086
個人積分：394分
文章編號：81128139
hotonpone wrote:
對呀~~他們講封存，但是是教育部做加密的動作呀~~
請問教育部做加密的行為有依法嗎？
請問依什麼法呢？？
好意跟您請教一下
不敢回答？
您也不用回了…事實相當明確
坐等事實明確了…就看您怎麼處理蔡同學的問題
我就等著看…這群說要發起罷免的網友，如何發起罷免
紙永遠包不住火…就看什麼時候燒起來了。
如果是假的，那彭文正，終將消失
如果是真的，那蔡英文總統還有什麼資格居高位呢？
士大夫之無恥是謂國恥，看蘇院長公然把民意公投當做什麼呢？
而現今新聞主流媒體無法實現第4權監督政府
而網路又有帶風向1450的網軍，然怪國之將亡必有妖
學位真假如此容易之事，竟有辦法搞的如此
真是…國之將亡呀~~~~看看那些號稱如果是假的
要怎麼罷免的網友，好好兌現自己的承諾
人怎麼會變得如此無恥呢？？魔戒權力、金錢魔力真是可怕
坐等英國ico 3/24如何生出蔡同學口試委員名單
個人積分：394分
文章編號：81208535
轉貼林環牆臉書
An Open Letter to Vice-Chanellor of the University of London
22 March 2021
Professor Wendy Thomson
Vice-Chanellor of the University of London
c/o Fiona Bernardone (Mrs), PA to the Vice-Chancellor
Re: Issues of President Ing-wen Tsai's PhD-degree fraud
Dear Fiona:
I hope this email find you well during the COVID19 pandemic. Two years ago, I started to contact you on 06 August 2019 to convey my concern about President Ing-Wen Tsai’s fake-PhD issues to Vice Chancellor (VC) Wendy Thomson. At that time, you notified me that you would ask the Office of Diploma to investigate my inquiry into Tsai’s issues. Unfortunately, the later development indicated that the University of London and the London School of Economics (LSE) were reluctant to disclose the truth.
For the cause of academic ethics, I never stopped the investigation of Tsai’s PhD scandal. This scandal is particularly severe and shameful because she holds a supreme-power position in Taiwan.
Here are some updates from my investigation in Taiwan and I take the liberty to share them with you and VC Wendy Thomson:
1. President Tsai has recently been found that she was actually hired as a lecturer at Soochow University starting from 01 August 1983. Soochow has been a private university in Taiwan.
2. This finding once again confirms that Tsai was not awarded an LSE PhD on 14 March 1984 and that the alleged PhD viva of 16 Oct 1983 (a Sunday) was actually a fabricated event.
For your information, in the 1980s, any PhD holder's starting position with any university in Taiwan was always a position of “Associate Professor” at that time. But in stark contrast to the then-prevalent situation, Tsai’s starting position was a position of “Lecturer” and this position began on 01 August 1983, which was just about two months and sixteen days before the alleged PhD oral examination of 16 October 1983.
It was totally impossible that an LSE PhD candidate actually taught in Taiwan while also having to prepare in London at the same time for her PhD oral examination on a “magic” Sunday.
It should be very clear that VC Wendy Thomson can see the sheer absurdity of Tsai‘s being a lecturer in Taiwan and concurrently being a so-called PhD candidate in London.
I have obtained other evidence as well in support of my finding that both Tsai and the UK side have jointly attempted to cover up the entire scandal.
For instance, there has been no record of any formal acquisition of an examined PhD thesis in the case of Ing-Wen Tsai according to the UoL's own documents. However, both the UoL and Tsai claimed that the PhD thesis was lost. The UoL further said that Tsai’s so-called PhD thesis was lost between 1984 and 2010 because of the UoL’s internal remodeling. Anyone can refute such a “lost” excuse in an instant for nothing can be lost if it does not preexist.
Now, the First-Tier Tribunal has resolved the “Territoriality” issue relating to Michael Richardson’s FOIA2000 request and the ICO must respond to Richardson’s inquiry into Tsai’s PhD examiners by the extended deadline of 24 March 2021. We will see very soon.
I see no reason why the UoL refused to disclose Tsai’s PhD examiners for the so-call “Sunday Viva”. In fact, such information about a PhD candidate’s examiners should be public in the academic world.
Why do the UoL and LSE want to risk tarnishing or insulting themselves without learning a lesson from the mistakes they had made in a decade?
In 2011, the notorious Gaddafi scandal broke out and embarrassed the LSE, a British prestigious university in the world.
In 2013, the media disclosed that the LSE lied in the first place that former Sri Lanka President’s son Sajith Prenadasa was awarded a bachelor degree. In fact, Sajith Prenadasa never completed his undergraduate study in the university.
Is another scandal forthcoming soon? I am worried.
I’d like to remind VC Wendy Thomson that If the UoL and LSE dare fabricate two examiners (external and internal) without upholding academic ethics, we will soon see a shocking global scandal much worse than the Gaddafi scandal. I hope these two universities could be courageous enough to tell the truth.
No one can hide things forever in the dark. Leonardo da Vinci said it well: “Nothing is hidden under the sun.”
Best regards,
Hwan
______________________________________________
Hwan C. Lin, PhD
Associate Professor of Economics
Belk College of Business
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
個人積分：394分
文章編號：81234304
個人積分：4130分
文章編號：81235024
個人積分：4742分
文章編號：81235829
個人積分：13分
文章編號：81235954
個人積分：0分
文章編號：81237378
