核電是綠色能源嗎?(2022/7/7更新 天然氣與核能歸為綠色永續的過渡能源)

不管核能是綠電或是潔淨能源

核能都是Low Carbon Energy
Allen Yeh
allen_yeh
免責聲明:本文係德國在台協會編譯,相關資訊參考來自可信的政府機關、科學機構和其他來源。儘管經過交叉查證,我們還是無法百分之百保證該資訊的準確性。請知悉:某些數據是暫時的,未來可能會有調整的可能性。
sonadora
這是德國外交部的文章,你的時空線是二戰德國統一歐洲膩? 啊,原來是考古文…
https://www.sustainability-times.com/low-carbon-energy/a-number-of-eu-nations-embrace-nuclear-as-a-green-energy-source/


Europe is facing an energy crisis and solutions must not only be expedient but also green. With the price of natural gas soaring within the European Union and renewables lagging behind schedule, an answer to the grouping’s problems lies in a clean and ample energy source: nuclear.

“The long-term response to the current situation in Europe must be to speed up the deployment of renewable energy sources, but also of energy efficiency solutions,” explains Simone Tagliapietra, a senior fellow at the economic think-tank Bruegel in Brussels.

Unless sustainable long-term solutions are found, Europe is in for frequent blackouts, experts have warned.

To forestall such a scenario, 10 EU states have asked the European Commission to add nuclear energy to the green sources of power on the continent, arguing that it is an “affordable, stable and independent energy source,” whose increased deployment will benefit the continent.

“The rise of energy prices [has] shown how important is it to reduce our energy dependence on third countries as fast as possible,” explained the 10 nations, which are France, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia and Romania.

Some of these countries are already banking on nuclear by developing new power plants with the help of modern Russian technology.

However, except for France, which derives 70% of its domestically produced electricity from its nuclear power plants, no European nation currently relies primarily on nuclear energy. In all, only around 26% of electricity produced in the EU is generated by nuclear even as coal-fired plants remain dominant in several nations

At the same time, more than 90% of natural gas used within the 27-member grouping is purchased from Russia and other outside producers, which exposes EU countries to significant volatility in energy prices.

“Supply tensions will be more and more frequent and we have no choice but to diversify our supply. We should pay attention not to increase our dependency on energy imports from outside Europe,” wrote the 10 nations in support of nuclear power.

“While renewable energy sources play a key role for our energy transition, they cannot produce enough low-carbon electricity to meet our needs, at a sufficient and a constant level,” they added, stressing that nuclear must be part of Europe’s energy plans.

Yet not all EU members see eye to eye on nuclear. Germany is planning to shut down all its reactors by the end of next year in a blow to the prospect of Europe’s energy independence and its promised transition to low-carbon economies.

Encouragingly for the proponents of nuclear energy, however, Brussels has given indications that it is viewing nuclear as a viable source of green and ample energy, a view shared by the International Energy Agency.

In another positive development for nuclear in Europe, the government of the United Kingdom is seeking to green the country’s economy by incorporating nuclear power into the energy pie alongside a growing share of renewables.

“A constant base supply of nuclear power could continue to meet demand when renewable generation falters because the wind isn’t blowing and the Sun isn’t shining,” explains William Nuttall, professor of energy at the Open University in the UK.


能源不穩定,半導體廠怎麼創造產能?怎麼擴廠?
Allen Yeh
下午忙,
請發文的把自己的文章看一遍,
看清楚了,到底是誰說核電是綠電?
然後,請注意,同一批人,有沒有說燃氣是綠電?
allen_yeh wrote:
核能都是Low Carbon Energy


這句話沒錯。
但,低碳能源不僅僅是核能。

太陽能、風力、水力、潮汐,都是。

而且更低。

因為核電廠必須同時有燃油發電場作為備載電力來源。

----

孩子們,別傻了,能源議題不是你死我活,

天底下沒有絕對完美的能源,如果有,世界上其他人都不是笨蛋,
有完美的能源,大家都會用。

事實上,核能佔全世界能源的多少比重?

===

有時間打嘴砲,趕快去研發核融合技術,
那才會是乾淨的能源。

ps. 氫電池也講了超過20年了吧!?
誰都知道氫電池很環保,但實際上?
tdbigman wrote:
太陽能、風力、水力、潮汐(恕刪)


這裡面通通在台灣都不能當基載.潮汐?跟地熱一樣成本直接打死的東西就別提了

核電廠的備援機組平時就是擺著,是現在塔綠斑擠不出電才拿來長時間上線
要把核電當綠色能源?

民進黨政府拉不下這個臉啦, 死也要守著

拿掉反核神主牌, 民進黨還剩什麼?
看別人不順眼, 是自己修為不夠
Wanton1812
可是反核神主牌是上世紀老舊的價值
張政之 wrote:
(恕刪)


可是 台灣核能

什麼時候可以取代掉發電佔比快70%的火力發電廠

開始要找核五廠跟核六廠了嗎?

發展綠能是為了減碳,但同時增加火力發電
甚至火力發電的比例,未來比現在更高
這是玩哪招啊?
tdbigman wrote:
因為核電廠必須同時有燃油發電場作為備載電力來源。


這個燃油發電機組是拿來當作電廠全黑時使用的
除了台灣之外, 應該沒人把它拿來並聯到電網使用
因此他並不是備載電力來源
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 13)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!