turtlins wrote: 當年的倫大論文通過口試之後， 是由口試委員把學生繳交的兩本論文（如果是兩名口試委員的話）， 連同口試報告一起繳給高階學位辦公室，
請問turtlins兄
上面這個說法是從何而來？
我看你另外一篇文章，也只有提到
turtlins wrote:
之前SHL回覆網路上某人提問時還提到，論文是從口試委員那兒送過來。所以，合起來就是口試委員送交學位辦公室，辦公室才送交圖書館。學生沒有出現在這流程中。
https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=638&t=5959877
先在此感謝回覆
turtlins wrote:
你的問題點是什麼？
All degrees from that period were awarded via the University of London and the thesis would have been sent first to their Senate House Library.
The Senate House Library records confirm that a copy was received and sent by them to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS). There is a listing of Dr Tsai’s thesis ‘Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions’ in the IALS index document “Legal Research in the United Kingdom 1905-1984”, which was published in 1985
那段期間所有的學位由倫敦大學授與，而論文會先被送到SHL
SHL的紀錄確認了他們收到論文並由他們送到IALS.
Historically it was the case that any doctoral theses awarded by the University of London had two physical copies submitted. One copy would be retained at the central University library – the University of London Library (as we were called before our name change to Senate House Library some years ago) while the second copy would be sent to the relevant college that the student in question studied at – so King’s College, SOAS, LSE, Royal Holloway and so on.
根據校史，任何獲得倫敦大學頒授學位的博士論文都呈交了兩份實體複本。一份會保存在大學的總圖書館——倫敦大學圖書館（University of London Library，幾年前我們改名為參議會圖書館［Senate House Library］之前的名稱），第二份則會被送往呈交該論文之學生所就讀的相關學院——如國王學院、亞非學院（SOAS）、倫敦政經學院（LSE）、皇家哈洛威學院等等。.
By the 1990’s Senate House Library was typically receiving something like 100 metres of new theses every academic year from the Higher Degrees Office (the administrative office overseeing all of the work around higher degrees at the University Of London). At this point when the Library received each new thesis from the Higher Degrees Office, one of our Library staff would have to manually create and type in a catalogue record for each new thesis on our Library catalogue – author, title, location, classmark, note, subject and so on – just as you can see in the records. All of this information was taken from the paperwork that the Higher Degrees Office would send along with each thesis. Clearly this was a very time consuming process and resulted in the Library having to dedicate one full-time member of staff to cataloguing new theses – and even then at peak times this still resulted in delays and backlogs in getting everything catalogued onto the system and available.
到了1990年代，參議會圖書館每學年通常都會從高階學位辦公室（監督倫敦大學高階學位所有相關工作的行政辦公室）收到排列起來約有一百公尺長的新論文。圖書館從高階學位辦公室收到每一本新論文時，我們圖書館職員當中就有人必須在我們的圖書館館藏書目中，以手工用打字機為每一份新論文製作一份館藏書目紀錄，把作者（author）、題目（title）、架位（location）、分類碼（classmark）、註記（note）、主題（subject）等等打上去。這些資訊全都取自於高階學位辦公室隨每一份論文送來的紙本文件。顯然這是一個非常耗時的過程，導致圖書館必須投入一名職員全職製作新論文的館藏紀錄——即使如此，到了尖峰時段，還是造成館藏書目建入系統並可供使用的工作延誤與積壓。
3B014 wrote:
不好意思沒有說淸楚，(恕刪)
turtlins wrote: 當年的倫大論文通過口試之後， 是由口試委員把學生繳交的兩本論文（如果是兩名口試委員的話）， 連同口試報告一起繳給高階學位辦公室，
