我要回覆

韓訪美唬爛這個！慘被自家市府打臉

Summer Time 1620

198分

71樓

Summer Time 1620

個人積分：198分

文章編號：72736519

既然有自知之明知道自己比不上,就不要在這裡丟人現眼了!

hammerchiou wrote:
我們這種小人物怎麼...(恕刪)

Summer Time 1620

198分

72樓

Summer Time 1620

個人積分：198分

文章編號：72736555

同意你的見解

nwcs wrote:
閉門座談和演講也能...(恕刪)

青康藏

8920分

73樓

青康藏

個人積分：8920分

文章編號：72737237

lordkon wrote:
如今韓跟當年馬有沒有七八分像

勿忘當年633...(恕刪)

還好不像阿扁，這就放心了

我思故我在~~

cougar2015

32473分

74樓

cougar2015

個人積分：32473分

文章編號：72737356

hammerchiou wrote:
韓訪美唬爛這個！慘...(恕刪)

原來是三立新聞......

lucky88

11分

75樓

lucky88

個人積分：11分

文章編號：72737529

韓國瑜一直都是能撈就撈、能混就混的人，

自述當立委期間每天美酒、美女、麻將都不上班的，

直播自己說對市政一點都不了解，未來四年就是作秀做到滿，每天中天實境秀這樣

Yoshide

16分

76樓

Yoshide

個人積分：16分

文章編號：72737563

Schindler wrote:
你所寫的有些不是影...(恕刪)

Who started the initiative is really hard to say. As so-called expert/scholar/politician usually have their own (low) self-esteem to be protected...

The question is, based on what mentality, a closed-door discussion has to be advertised as a public speech?? And by the same mentality, what else he said were also inaccurately (exaggerated)? Like the ROC history lesson after China officials left?

Yoshide

16分

77樓

Yoshide

個人積分：16分

文章編號：72737582

Joseph.Yang wrote:
王丹這部份，弟與兄...(恕刪)

Discussion of Wang seems off-topic. If I were OP I'll request to open another thread for that discussion.

Yoshide

16分

78樓

Yoshide

個人積分：16分

文章編號：72737618

Summer Time 1620 wrote:
樓主沾沾自喜覺得有...(恕刪)

The question is, based on what mentality, a closed-door discussion has to be advertised as a public speech?? And by the same mentality, what else he said were also inaccurately (exaggerated)? Like the ROC history lesson after China officials left?