所羅門的惡夢666 wrote:
沒有腦補哦http...(恕刪)
以下是我對那篇報導的看法, 不會強迫你接受.
"But MLB was hesitant to approve any deal until a full investigation had been conducted. In order to fully vet Tsao, MLB deployed its investigative unit—the same group that had been put together to untangle PED use, and had also helped curb illegal activities in the signing of Latin American amateur players. After a lengthy investigation, Tsao, according to several sources, was cleared to sign with a major league team." 這段提到了調查團隊處理過禁藥跟中南美洲球員的問題. 重點在於"MLB deployed its investigative unit"這句, 因為Mitchell Investigation 是MLB委託的"獨立調查", 所以並沒有MLB的人在裡面. 而且Mitchell 也沒有查過MLB中南美洲球員的問題. 我認為這裡指的是MLB內部協助Mitchell調查的團隊, 而不是Mitchell 的調查團隊. 不然直接說是Mitchell就好了, 大家都知道是誰.
其實調查的人是誰根本沒差, 不管是誰在中華民國台灣境內都沒有調查權, 他們除了公開資料以外能拿到的也是有限. 總之是以未被起訴來作為沒放水的主要依據, 這點應該沒爭議吧?
我的實驗中完全沒有中華職棒聯盟的角色. 你硬要加進去只是模糊焦點而已. 已知的是MLB有第21條規定, 實驗的目的是近百年沒被引用的規定是否會被執行. 跟中華職棒無關
