從數字就可以看出費爸18冠的偉大!

文章關鍵字
第8點寫得很好,如何運用最精準省力是這次奪冠的關鍵,不是在那邊浪費力氣,打球不只要體力,也是要用頭腦的

撲殺天使 wrote:
第8點寫得很好,如...(恕刪)


有機會抄都還寫成這樣....
怎麼會很好...

人家隔天經濟學人雜誌就寫老將拿冠的 GAME PLAN....
數據更準確...(有時候跑多遠不如去算平均打了幾板...LENGTH OF RALLY)

"Today’s final was influenced by the conditions as well. The average length of the rallies, at 4.3 shots, was shorter than that of any of the three previous meetings between Mr Federer and Mr Nadal in Australia. Mr Federer was unusually aggressive with his forehand, especially his signature “inside-out” shot, in which he hits a cross-court forehand from the backhand corner of the court. Of the 42 such shots he hit today, he ended the point 26 times: a rate of 62%, which is nearly double his hard-court average of 35%. Some of those rally-ending shots were his own errors, but roughly two-thirds (17 of 26) won him the point. The last time Mr Federer defeated Mr Nadal at a major, at Wimbledon in 2007, the inside-out shot was potent—ending points on 47% of attempts—but he did not hit it as often or as successfully. For today’s match, he executed a game plan suited to both his age and the conditions."


真的是2017年初,費天王送給他的球迷最棒的春節禮物了!
經濟學人的科學分析,很棒。 現在的運動真是他媽的數學的領域。但有時太科學也是怪怪得。看到費神年初的表現,會不會是迴光返照照,其實是職業的最後一年了?? 單反,、、、、、、真的是太神了。

s07179 wrote:
經濟學人的科學分析...(恕刪)


單反還是Gasquet與瓦林卡較強

但費神巔峰時期的單反除了Nadal能破解外

也的確屬於一流的...(尤其是切球)

hhlin wrote:
有機會抄都還寫成這樣...(恕刪)


只有我覺得老費是靠反拍贏了他第18冠嗎?
bryan7668 wrote:
只有我覺得老費是靠反拍贏了他第18冠嗎?

+1

我記得有一次費納對決前, 有看到一張圖,
費的策略, 背景是一個黑板, 畫滿了各種狀況的對應,
納的策略, 就一句話, 打 費 的反手拍^^
updated: 找到那張圖了...

from https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/10464388_832533163532014_2624353894778747841_n.jpg?oh=87eecd2056c0728053a47653c4e2f567&oe=593CEC46

這次費的反手拍至勝球不少...
年初的表演賽就覺得反手拍抽球攻擊的頻率變高了...

其實眾家好手已經幫Roger的反手練的更好
從這次的正反手 Unforced errors,他的反手不一定是他的弱項
ec wrote:
+1我記得有一次費...(恕刪)
今年最大的變化就是反拍致勝球很多

而且反拍也可以攻擊

這點費爸的自我要求及找教練,尋求不同的可能及方式

再加上大量科學化的統計分析訓練

只有一句話可以形容:

最可怕的不是天才,是已經天才又加上超過100%以上的努力
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!