Giovanniwu wrote:
这位美国官员说话只说(恕刪)
一般來說經濟差三倍就沒對抗性
日本現在不就是
沒拉著美國根本不敢動
個人積分：330624分
文章編號：82400317
個人積分：14分
文章編號：82400414
以下兩種翻譯，意思相差到完全相反，到底英文原文的意思是什麼？
原文：
In the past, as long as there was a large disparity, a gap, in military power and economic power between the two countries, the relationship was reasonably stable. But China has become much more economically successful and much more militarily and technologically capable. China is now close to being a peer power to the United States, which it never was.
(1) 翻譯成如下：
“首先在過去，只要兩國在軍事和經濟實力上存在巨大差距，中美關係就相當穩定。可是現在中國在經濟上取得了更大成就，軍事技術能力也更強。如今的中國即將成為一個匹敵美國的大國，這種現像從來沒有出現過。”
(2) 翻譯成如下：
過去，只要兩國在軍事實力和經濟實力上存在較大差距、差距，關係就相當穩定。 但中國在經濟上變得更加成功，在軍事和技術上也更加強大。 中國現在已接近成為美國的同行強國，而它從來都不是。
這需要問人嗎?! 小時候老師不是有教嗎? 如果看不懂，就看看上下文的意思就對了。簡單的就是說，中國自己以為實力跟美國很接近了，但是從來沒有過。
個人積分：330624分
文章編號：82401098
個人積分：14分
文章編號：82401138
個人積分：14分
文章編號：82402036
所以，就第一句而言，兩種翻譯應該差異不大。
There are two reasons for this.
In the past, as long as there was a large disparity, a gap, in military power and economic power between the two countries, the relationship was reasonably stable. But China has become much more economically successful and much more militarily and technologically capable. China is now close to being a peer power to the United States, which it never was.
Secondly, in the Xi Jinping era — which now is about almost nine years — China’s leadership has become more assertive, more ideological, and more brazen, more overt, in challenging global norms and challenging U.S. leadership. We’ve seen bullying behavior intensify by China.
個人積分：14分
文章編號：82402244
個人積分：396分
文章編號：82402541
個人積分：980分
文章編號：82402669
個人積分：268分
文章編號：82404677
