蘋果公司成為華爾街頭號沽空目標

他們有沒有估到臉書 (Meta) ?昨晚一下跌掉24.56%,歷史高點是 379.38(去年八月),今天 97.94,比疫情開始時的低點還低!
九份老街
臉書這類企業,財報估計難度很高,營收與盈餘不易統計,放空的人會有顧忌;另外,在臉書獲利大幅下跌之際,公司還要大幅擴張資本支出,才是暴跌主因,相對上,蘋果業績雖不佳,沒有要大幅增加資本支出。
keung50
臉書 (Meta) 最大問題是玩 元宇宙 , 太燒錢, 但做出來的連ONLINE GMAE都不如
鈔能力 wrote:
賈伯斯真的很行,把這麼難用的系統,搞到大家都假裝沒看見

不會難用吧?算是很穩定的系統。與股價無關就是了。

FreeBSD is Just macOS Without the Good Bits

This is as much a myth about macOS as about FreeBSD; that macOS is just FreeBSD with a pretty GUI. The two operating systems do share a lot of code, for example most userland utilities and the C library on macOS are derived from FreeBSD versions. Some of this code flow works in the other direction, for example FreeBSD 9.1 and later include a C++ stack and compiler that were originally developed for macOS, with major parts of the work done by Apple employees. Other parts are very different.

Darwin - which consists of the XNU kernel, IOkit (a driver model), and POSIX compatibility via a BSD compatibility layer - makes up part of macOS (as well as iOS, tvOS, and others) includes a few subsystems (such as the VFS, process model, and network implementation) from (older versions of) FreeBSD, but is mostly an independent implementation. The similarities in the userland, however, make it much easier to port macOS code to FreeBSD than any other system - partially because a lot of command-line utilities were imported along with the BSD bits from FreeBSD. For example, both libdispatch (Grand Central Dispatch in Apple's marketing) and libc++ were written for macOS and worked on FreeBSD before any other OS.

以上摘錄自 FreeBSD Myths
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!