個人積分：1098分
文章編號：84750986
個人積分：1098分
文章編號：84751053
個人積分：4937分
文章編號：84751935
bmw_m3 wrote:
有人提到帶風向,希望(恕刪)
說的比較簡單
以台北市來說吧
像是去年萬華爆發 綠黨追著柯文哲罵 為什麼不封果菜批發市場？
問題在於 果菜批發市場是中央管的 柯根本沒權說要關就關
以這幾天的洗版來說吧 我的估算跟柯比較接近
致死率 不該用 NZ 的 0.05% 計算
而是應該採用 香港的 0.7% 計算
生活習慣 疫苗品牌 比例 注射時間 等等都應該要考慮進去
而不是簡單的抓一個比例最低的做一個好看的數字
畢竟 NZ 從一開始就是以最嚴重的後果考慮整個防疫措施
試問鬧鐘又是以什麼考量在規劃整個防疫措施？
口罩 來個口罩之亂
普篩 不給做 快篩是違法
PCR 量能從前年的三萬 去年萬華爆發 還是只有三萬
被逼到沒辦法 才不得已開放快篩
疫苗能買有藥證的 偏要買個只有 EUA 的
該普篩 獨厚基隆 搞個類普篩
確診攀高 北市人口密度 及人數本來就比較高 偏偏快篩分配就是比高雄少很多
前幾天 PCR 不夠又說 快篩陽性也算
快篩 又來個快篩之亂
該買口服藥物 疫苗 偏就一直拖
現在柯提出 以篩代隔 又罵柯不夠嚴謹
這些事情 是地方該做的嗎？
這些東西不用到中央等級看啥大數據
隨便一個宅男在家 google 一下就可以看出來很多事情內幕不簡單
但 1450 洗版就能洗成 99.5% 都輕症
不要鬧了 就算 0.5% 中症 換算完也是 五萬中症
這樣就足夠把醫療拖垮了
他朝若能同淋雪
此生也曾共白頭
白頭若是雪可替
世間哪有負心漢
感謝您,希望幫忙持續呼籲,不過有一股強大力量似乎引領著世界避免疫情趨緩.
這麼多政治人物 我只信柯批
個人積分：275分
文章編號：84752005
bmw_m3 wrote:
請問omicron症(恕刪)
大大..你這些話.......我在4月中就在個大媒體臉書新聞底下留言過了..
既然都說是屬於輕症.....為何還要浪費一堆的人力.時間.資原..
去做那些所謂的快篩.隔離.集體大量施打疫苗?
這不是壓縮了中重症以及其他疾病的中種症患者的醫療資源??
政府不是該把資源人力放在照顧這些中重症患者上??
結果就是有死忠的回我..政府這麼做就是要避免太多人感染造成醫療崩潰~~
現在的這些逐步放寬政策..才是造成醫療緊縮醫療量能崩潰的原凶吧
佩服您唷! 其實藥物與重症需要的儀器也是兩年前的知識,看起來有一股力量還是想要讓世界繼續沉浸在疫情壟罩的狀態,表面上說要防疫,但人力支援與群聚快篩卻加強了病毒傳播速度.
就算大部分都是輕症 剩餘的中重症 加上不確定跑去篩的 就足以癱瘓醫療系統 如果不克制的話~ 現在醫院又不只有新冠病患 其他住院的 意外地也得看醫生阿
個人積分：60分
文章編號：84752029
里長直接發唾液快篩每人兩劑?人流不要再動.
個人積分：1098分
文章編號：84752669
個人積分：980分
文章編號：84754589
jobba wrote:
現在是只要
Over the past year we have learned that SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of neurocognitive disease, psychiatric illness, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke even one year after infection, among those with “mild” acute infection. We have learned that even people with mild disease can suffer from neurodegeneration 4-5 months down the line.12 It is hard to think of another infectious disease that has resulted in such a toll to public health. This is not the flu.
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1096
Opinion
The government wants us to learn to live with covid-19, but where is the learning?
BMJ 2022; 377 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1096 (Published 29 April 2022)
Cite this as: BMJ 2022;377:o1096
Deepti Gurdasani, senior lecturer in machine learning1, Hisham Ziauddeen, clinical research associate2
Author affiliations
On 21 February 2022, Boris Johnson, the UK prime minister presented his government’s latest strategy for living with covid-19 to the House of Commons. He stated that the high level of population immunity, the success of the vaccination programme, and the availability of antivirals meant that “restrictions” were no longer required, as the link between cases and severe disease had been “substantially weakened.”1
With this change in policy, the legal mandate for self-isolation for people infected with covid, and what little financial support had been available to support people to self-isolate was removed. Contact tracing also ended, which meant the only way that cases could be identified was through symptomatic individuals coming forward for testing (if they qualified based on the very restrictive eligible symptoms list). On 1 April, despite the prime minister’s assurances that everyone would have access to a test, free testing was removed for most people, except for “high-risk settings” and those on the limited list of eligibility for antivirals.
Just six weeks after the prime minister’s February statement, the UK found itself in yet another pandemic wave, with the highest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 to date.2 This was partly related to the spread of the BA.2 omicron subvariant, thought to be 30-40% more transmissible than BA.1.3 This wave saw hospital admissions with covid-19 reach similar levels to the first omicron wave peak just weeks earlier, and deaths involving covid-19 also increased significantly.4 While less than half of hospital admissions had covid-19 as the primary cause, there was a considerable increase in these, and likely a significant contribution of nosocomial infections to hospital admissions.5
The impact of the pandemic on the NHS has been cumulative and devastating over the past two years. Even as our former health secretary Matt Hancock has declared the pandemic over, the NHS remains under extremely high pressure.67 Waits for A&E during the omicron wave have hit levels that have never been seen before in the history of the NHS.8 Several NHS trusts put out warnings of dangerous delays at hospitals, with some ambulance services declaring critical incidents.9 The President of Royal College of Emergency Medicine sounded a warning about an escalating crisis where for the first time in its history the NHS could no longer stick to its “contract” with the nation to reach seriously ill patients in a timely way.9 This is a patient safety issue. We know that routine care has been compromised for years, but the fact that the NHS is now unable to provide timely emergency care should worry us all. The causes of this are complex and many predate the pandemic, some by several years. The chronic underfunding of the NHS, the increase in early voluntary retirement, staff shortages related to government’s poor workforce planning, the hostile environment and Brexit, had all hugely affected the NHS long before the pandemic started. However, over the last two years, the failure to adequately and promptly control the spread of covid-19 during the pandemic or to support staff—for example with adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and pay—the demand of dealing with successive waves of the pandemic and the resulting worsening backlog of routine clinical care, and the impact of both acute covid and long covid on NHS staff, have all contributed to high levels of burnout, staff absence, staff taking early retirement, and staff leaving the NHS.10 And an ongoing, uncontrolled pandemic will continue to further deplete healthcare capacity. Despite this, calls for action by NHS leaders to alleviate the deteriorating situation have been rejected by government.11
Meanwhile, government policies that have failed to prevent widespread infection of the population have led to consistent rises in the prevalence of long covid in all age groups. We currently have an estimated 1.7 million people living with long covid for 28 days or more, with 784000 of these having had persistent symptoms now for more than a year.10 Over the past year we have learned that SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of neurocognitive disease, psychiatric illness, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke even one year after infection, among those with “mild” acute infection. We have learned that even people with mild disease can suffer from neurodegeneration 4-5 months down the line.12 It is hard to think of another infectious disease that has resulted in such a toll to public health. This is not the flu. Despite this, long covid was not mentioned in the prime minister’s February statement. The government’s approach to long covid and the attendant risks and costs have been to ignore it. Even as they invest in long covid research and set up clinics to treat this, there has been no attempt to prevent this via suppression.
The impact of, and the government’s wilful neglect of, covid-19 in children has been staggering. The relative increases in long covid have, unsurprisingly, been the greatest in children, increasing fourfold since July 2021.13 149000 children are estimated to have long covid (28 day definition) of whom 31000 have now had symptoms for more than a year.13 The rhetoric still remains that children are not impacted, and mitigations and vaccination for children have never been the priority. 21% of our population still remain unvaccinated, with the vast majority being children, among whom we are seeing the impacts of unmitigated spread with high levels of hospital admissions and long covid.
Ironically the “return to normal” policies have resulted in mass disruption, as transmission levels have surged massively with the drop of mitigations, contact tracing, and now free testing. There have been drops in school attendance and increases in staff sickness in education, healthcare, social care, transportation, and business, that have led to huge disruptions in various aspects of life that were deemed vital to restore in the rush to the return to normal.141516 Once again this was entirely predictable and once again raises an important question about the government’s learning to live with covid-19 strategy, namely, where is the learning?
The element of learning has been conspicuously absent from the government’s pandemic response strategy over the last two years, with similar rhetoric and policy decisions being repeated despite previous failures and in contradiction to the growing body of evidence on SARS-CoV-2. The persistent short term focus on economic growth has eroded public health and human capital—both key components of a healthy economy. The government’s strategy is grounded in denial, normalisation of disability and death, ableism, and overreliance on vaccines and therapies. Only 60% of our population is currently boosted with covid-19 vaccination, and even this protection wanes over time. The promise of antivirals has failed to fully materialise as many clinically vulnerable people struggle to get access to them.17 And basic public health principles of primary prevention of an airborne disease have been forgotten. Ventilation, high-grade masks (even in healthcare, where nosocomial infection is rife) are some of the most overlooked and effective tools to contain pandemic spread. These mitigations have had hugely positive impacts through the pandemic, not only with covid-19, but other airborne illnesses as well. Flu was almost eliminated for long periods, and we saw a huge reduction in deaths from acute respiratory disease such that even as covid-19 deaths remained high, excess deaths were reduced in 2022.18 Testing and isolation are vital, particularly in school environments where many children remain asymptomatic, but transmit covid-19 to the community. Ending isolation of those with infection, and disease surveillance will only worsen spread, while removing our ability to detect and respond.
Rather than burying its head in the sand and claiming victory over a pandemic that’s far from over, our government must take steps to protect the public from a rapidly adapting virus that causes severe long term multi-system disease. If the plan is to learn to live with covid-19, then we need to properly learn how to live with and manage it, not merely accept that a lot of people will suffer in our attempts to return to “normal.”
看不懂!
個人積分：845分
文章編號：84755463
保險的請領認定覺得不可能那麼鬆散，隨便拿支兩條線的快篩就能請，太容易做假。應該要醫院的PCR核酸證明，蓋醫院章，測試員醫師章和簽名的。
我就是無症狀 防疫險還是有出險~~ 二月初的時候 還沒現在那麼亂
個人積分：3907分
文章編號：84758005
個人積分：12923分
文章編號：84758066
