螢幕大小和內建顯卡對眼睛和播放、觀看影片都有正面的效果
IO介面多也是好處之一（我常接有的沒有的東西）
攜帶性我比較不會care
反正都是到一個定點坐下來用
背大包包和小一點的大包包也不會差太多
主要我會用adobe來修圖
螢幕問題完全不擔心
因為家裡已有一台H-IPS的螢幕STAND BY了
個人積分：258分
文章編號：8620738
個人積分：61分
文章編號：8620845
個人積分：95分
文章編號：8621051
MBP vs. MB
個人積分：12分
文章編號：8621449
個人積分：225分
文章編號：8635560
個人積分：95分
文章編號：8636335
個人積分：6537分
文章編號：8637029
dexit wrote:
再請教Antus，有...(恕刪)
I don't know about Fujitsu, never seen one and never used one. can't common on that.
however, I have seen Sony notebook quite often. I believe that Sony Z series has better LCD than either MacBook or Macbook Pro. even SR has better LCD than Apple. but Apple is better than CR.
although Macbook Pro has better LCD than Macbook, the difference is quite small. Unlike previous generation which Macbook has some of the worst LCD in it's price range.
again, both Apple use TN LCD. as i said before, if you are graphic designer or do graphic related work for a living, you need to invest a nice external monitor.
on the other hand, after seen many of your post, i guess i would suggest you go for Macbook Pro. it's not a lot more money since you have ADC, and you will not have the "what if" factor in the future.
another route to consider is to get 2.0G Macbook and a 24inch LCD. a external monitor is going to beat every notebook LCD regardless of price and manufactures.
個人積分：793分
文章編號：8637193
個人積分：74分
文章編號：8645656
tz1t wrote:
若是要找作影像設計為主力的筆電，這一年來的sony機台螢幕規格都相對來比較好，apple很大部分還在吃OSX的老本，硬體用料在對影像設計處於較被動的狀態，sony現在的高階筆電都強調高彩廣色域或的訴求了，apple還是一樣冷處理，規格上還是用支援百萬色一語帶過
krist wrote:
說真的新力的螢幕幕真的看起來就是比蘋果好，不管是顏色、角度色偏等都是高的，但是低階的新力還是一樣不好啦，一分錢一分貨囉，不過以高階的相比真是打假的啦
Sony 最大的優勢是本身同時跨 AV/PC 雙領域
這波 VAIO 新機(type T, Z, A)搭載的顯示器有許多關鍵技術來自自家的 Bravia
當絕大多數的筆電螢幕(包括 MB/MBP)連 sRGB 色域的支援都還不完整
type A 已經能支援 100% Adobe RGB 色域
同樣是 LED 背光模組
MBP 是白光(顏色表現與可視角度比原先的CCFL還糟)
而 type A 則是 RGB 三原色(每個像素由RGGB四顆LED組成)
後者的演色性遠超過前者
甚至可以期望將來見到 VAIO 搭載 OLED 顯示器
分享 http://post.mchiang.name | 臉書 http://facebook.com/mchiang
個人積分：18分
文章編號：8665717
