Chase Jarvis posted some high ISO samples of D7000, straight out of camera. Dpreview has some samples for 60D. So I think: why not do a comparison?

Remember, this is by no means accurate or in-dpeth. Very preliminary. Just eye-balling things. For in-depth reviews, just wait for Dpreview and DxO.

Both are JPG straight out of camera. No mentioning of NR setting. Default setting seems most likely.

The originals: D7000 60D

I was trying to find areas with equal brightness. At least it's the best I can do. All pics are 100% crops.

60D vs D7000: preliminary high ISO comparison
60D vs D7000: preliminary high ISO comparison

Can you tell which is which? I can't. Top is 60D, bottom is D7000.



60D vs D7000: preliminary high ISO comparison
60D vs D7000: preliminary high ISO comparison

Still, not much difference. Again, top is 60D, bottom is D7000.

From what I can see, at ISO3200, 60D and D7000 are too close to call a winner.
文章關鍵字
roger_wang wrote:
Chase Jarv...(恕刪)


看不懂

比2台的高ISO是嗎
海男 wrote:
看不懂比2台的高IS...(恕刪)


Yes.
EOS 40D+BG-EN3/350D/17-40 f4L/70-200 f4L IS/50 f1.8/18-55 f5.6/MacBook&ThinkPad
海男 wrote:
看不懂比2台的高IS...(恕刪)


看不懂英文沒有關係,還有GOOGLE翻譯可以用


老實說我也看不出贏家,但60D好像好點。(但不排除是經過訊號處理)
ISO3200
JPG直出

第一組對照起來差不多
60D看起來乾淨一點點...

~~~~~~~~

第二組的比法很奇怪...



60D好像抹很大


15151515151
Guarnerius wrote:
60D好像抹很大15...(恕刪)



怎麼說?
roger_wang wrote:
Chase Jarv...(恕刪)



lightroom 3 才是王道..

ryankkkk wrote:
怎麼說?...(恕刪)


糊的顆粒較大
Guarnerius wrote:
糊的顆粒較大...(恕刪)



原來如此...
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!