這篇文章: http://www.truphotos.com/2010/09/15/sample-images-of-the-new-nikon-d7000/ 提到了D7000的ISO表現, 所參考的相片是從攝影師 Chase Jarvis (http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2010/09/nikon-d7000/) 的D7000 試拍得來的.

原文部份如下:
Some sample images and videos are up on the blog of photographer Chase Jarvis. According to some comments on the blog, the ISO performance of the D7000 is on par with the D700 at ISO3200, comparable to the D3 models and the images taken between ISO1600-3200 are commercially usable.Although 6400 is a little of a stretch, it is also good for other uses.
This sounds incredible and remain skeptical regarding this as the idea of “usability” varies from individual to individual. We have to wait till the bodies are shipped before more sample images are out, but based on this alone, we may conclude that the ISO performance of the D7000 is around 1-2 stops better than the D90 and D300s.
Personally, I find that anything above ISO800 on the D300s is unusable so usable ISO1600-3200 is music to my ears.


大致的意思如下:

ISO3200的表現上與D700不分軒峙, 媲美D3; ISO1600-3200 的成相以商業用途的標準來看是可用的, 雖然ISO6400開始有些噪點, 但若非用於專業用途上還是相當不錯的...... 總結是ISO的表現約比D90及D300s好上1-2級.
Nikon 終於發威了...

但還是買不起...
Nikon Z7, 14-30mm f/4 S, 35mm f1.8 S, 85mm f1.8 S
chstseng wrote:
這篇文章: http...(恕刪)


4萬的機身已經打平D700逼近D3了........好樣的!!
太誇張了......

DX的高ISO可以拿來跟D700 D3來比 5D2都可以一起下去比了......

我覺得要等dpreview的測試比較準
D7000 使用跟 SONY A55 一樣的感光元件。期待上市後兩台畫質對決的評比 !
http://tinyurl.com/2watel2

but images taken at ISO 3200 show hardly any pattern at maximum print sizes, while those taken at ISO 6400 are lightly grainy but still completely free of chroma noise.

這是我看到第二篇說D7000的ISO 3200是可以用的.......

沒看到圖我還是不相信
DX相機的ISO3200可以用實在很難相信阿....

小弟接受度比較高
D90 iso3200我都覺得可以用了......XD
縮圖無爛圖呀

絕種好男人 wrote:
小弟接受度比較高
D...(恕刪)
chstseng wrote:
這篇文章: http...(恕刪)


我比較喜歡她的對焦39點跟full HD
i'am Mr.w
jamesweng wrote:
縮圖無爛圖呀...(恕刪)


人家已經說 "hardly any pattern at maximum print sizes", 所以不是縮圖囉
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!