jjx874 wrote:
要我说区别的话就是对比度有区别，没有微对度这种名词存在的空间。
jjx874 wrote:
来了来了，镜片越少色(恕刪)
flody wrote:
蔡司賣鏡頭，所以會突出鏡頭差異
crossmatch wrote:
沒有 Micro Contrast 存在 ?
不如看看 Zeiss 怎說 : The ZEISS micro contrast “pop” is evident at every aperture until diffraction flattens performance with a heavy hand as discussed previously and as shown in MTF charts.
https://lenspire.zeiss.com/photo/en/article/micro-contrast-and-the-zeiss-pop-by-lloyd-chambers/
不過無論網上怎說, 最重要還是自己拍的照片是否感受到, 感受不到就是沒有... 完
elfwong wrote:
最後一句話我同意信者(恕刪)
ponsayboss wrote:
我覺得立體感不是指散(恕刪)
crossmatch wrote:
網上隨意找到 Zeiss 的宣傳文, 至於代不代表 Zeiss 立場 ? 出自何人手筆 ? 就不得而知. 不過文章最底有標註 : All rights reserved - Copyright © 2021 ZEISS India
3D pop
Harmonious bokeh thanks to excellent optical design.
For subjects that are as real as life itself.
Some subjects have a way of effectively catching a photographer’s eye. The ZEISS Batis lenses help photos convey the feeling that the areas in focus appear almost separate to the rest of the image. At wide-open aperture, they create the magical ZEISS 3D pop effect and deliver a harmonious bokeh for great visual impact.
