Sony T100「見山不是山,見山還是山」!

個人覺得T100卡片機拿來跟F31比,怪怪的....F31不如拿來跟850ix或900Ti比較好...

就畫質講,T100拿1/2.5的感光原件來衝810萬畫素(突破700萬的安全值),我覺得實在很冒險,
個人猜這也是用到BIONZ影像引擎的原因之一吧,相反的是F31是1/1.7 630萬畫素,就來
得安全多了,加上夜拍一向是F31d的強項....比夜拍沒幾家贏吧(同款產品下)

續航力來講,理論上T100的3吋LCD,應該要比EX-V7的2.5吋TFT來得耗電吧,拍照張數還能較多,
已經不簡單了(假設測張數的標準是一致的情況下)。
claire888 wrote:
那張貼紙好撕嗎?是很...(恕刪)

小心一點的話,不會難撕啊
我個人撕下後是沒有殘膠
但是有些地方的貼紙可別亂撕喔
像是QC OK之類的
買來之後一直覺得t100的快門開啟時間好短只有大約1~2秒.不過剛剛又研究了一下原來可利用場景選擇煙火模式,再將ev值由0~+2.0這樣就可將快門時間由2秒~8秒,因才研究出來不知道夜拍的效果如何及對相機本身有無不良影響也請各位大大分享經驗.

xsam wrote:
跟F31FD比....T100也可以叫 "畫質差"
尤其是夜拍及高ISO雜訊抑制....
By the way....F31Fd只有600萬像素~


The first thing is, F31fd is not the same type as T100.
It use a 2.5" Screen Only, while T100 use a 3" screen (Not to mention how bright is T100's Screen)

Why you don't mention Fujiflim's Ultra-portable machine? The Z5fd?

Z5fd 's CIPA is 200張 only. See, no where close T100.
And it only has a 2.5" LCD.

Oh, Nikion's new S500, CIPA 測試續航力 180張, and still 2.5" SCreen.

May be F31fd's high ISO pictures is better than that of T100,
BUT it may not be better in day light outdoor pictures.

And according to DPView, "the F31 exhibits fairly strong purple fringing at high contrast boundaries and around specular highlights "

The New Flying MacBook Pro; Seatbelts sold Separately!
Raymond Lui wrote:
May be F31fd's high ISO pictures is better than that of T100,
BUT it may not be better in day light outdoor pictures.


Maybe you should borrow from others and compare with two DCs....
Don't guess! Because I compared them before...

Not only indoor or Night Shot... even if outdoor...F31FD is the best!
Only Canon equals in contest...

AS for you say 2.5" and 3.0"....OK...That's my fault...Because the battery of F31fd is 1800mAH....so.....580/CIPA...so T100 is better than it...OK~no excuse ~
Anyway, I have to say F31fd is not the same class as T100.
It's not an ultra-portable machine. You can't slip it inside a typical pocket.

Z5fd is an ultra-portable machine that fits in right the same class as T100.
You can compare the two and see :-)

The New Flying MacBook Pro; Seatbelts sold Separately!
Raymond Lui wrote:
...ultra-portable machine...


Come on~~~ that's a problem of model design and technique......

if you're right....Canon's DC is Ultra-Portable,too....... right?
OK.....Now, everyone knows....which is better between Canon and Sony???

The Fact is....the Technique of SONY is not good enough...even if it has Carl Zeiss~
what I say is Definition of pictures....not style or model or function design~~~OK?

Only Style can't pass through the crucible of everyone's eyes!!!!
[Note:]
Content involve comparisons is deleted as respect to the thread creator.


[END OF NOTE]
xsam wrote:
By the way....F31Fd只有600萬像素~


600萬會不夠嗎 除非要沖洗10x8以上相片 不然已經夠用了

比起眾多廠牌把1/2.5吋ccd做到700萬以上 這樣好多了



Raymond Lui 似乎是SONY忠實粉絲
Stanley1127 wrote:
600萬會不夠嗎 除...(恕刪)


大哥.....我那句的意思......就是F31只有600萬...還把其他家打假的....是這個意思啦~

Raymond Lui wrote:
Anyway, I am not here to argue about which is better.
WHich that fits one's need is always the best.



I totally agree with you~
關閉廣告
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 8)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!