xsam wrote:
跟F31FD比....T100也可以叫 "畫質差"
尤其是夜拍及高ISO雜訊抑制....
By the way....F31Fd只有600萬像素~
The first thing is, F31fd is not the same type as T100.
It use a 2.5" Screen Only, while T100 use a 3" screen (Not to mention how bright is T100's Screen)
Why you don't mention Fujiflim's Ultra-portable machine? The Z5fd?
Z5fd 's CIPA is 200張 only. See, no where close T100.
And it only has a 2.5" LCD.
Oh, Nikion's new S500, CIPA 測試續航力 180張, and still 2.5" SCreen.
May be F31fd's high ISO pictures is better than that of T100,
BUT it may not be better in day light outdoor pictures.
And according to DPView, "the F31 exhibits fairly strong purple fringing at high contrast boundaries and around specular highlights "
The New Flying MacBook Pro; Seatbelts sold Separately!
Raymond Lui wrote:
May be F31fd's high ISO pictures is better than that of T100,
BUT it may not be better in day light outdoor pictures.
Maybe you should borrow from others and compare with two DCs....
Don't guess! Because I compared them before...
Not only indoor or Night Shot... even if outdoor...F31FD is the best!
Only Canon equals in contest...
AS for you say 2.5" and 3.0"....OK...That's my fault...Because the battery of F31fd is 1800mAH....so.....580/CIPA...so T100 is better than it...OK~no excuse ~

It's not an ultra-portable machine. You can't slip it inside a typical pocket.
Z5fd is an ultra-portable machine that fits in right the same class as T100.
You can compare the two and see :-)
The New Flying MacBook Pro; Seatbelts sold Separately!
Raymond Lui wrote:
...ultra-portable machine...
Come on~~~ that's a problem of model design and technique......
if you're right....Canon's DC is Ultra-Portable,too....... right?
OK.....Now, everyone knows....which is better between Canon and Sony???
The Fact is....the Technique of SONY is not good enough...even if it has Carl Zeiss~
what I say is Definition of pictures....not style or model or function design~~~OK?
Only Style can't pass through the crucible of everyone's eyes!!!!
關閉廣告