小弟於近日內即將購入A700,但爬了許多文章之後,覺得很多前輩都推薦1680z這顆菜頭,頓時讓我陷入是否該買kit(配16-105)還是買單機直上16-80z呢? 還麻煩各位前輩給我多點建議,謝謝
個人積分：166分
文章編號：7222453
個人積分：38分
文章編號：7222583
個人積分：60分
文章編號：7222648
個人積分：3分
文章編號：7225563
個人積分：268分
文章編號：7226874
個人積分：3分
文章編號：7229699
個人積分：5分
文章編號：7231011
如果版大不介意看英文，可以參考如下對比評測
http://www.newcamerareview.com/sony_cz_16_80mm_and_sony_16_105mmid222.html
結論為
If you don't really need the extra focal length, and need a little extra speed, and, like to look at your pictures at 100% screen size, just go out and buy the Carl Zeiss 16-80mm. For all others, get the less expensive Sony 16-105mm F/3.5-5.6.
Build quality. Both the same.
*Macro sharpness. 16-105mm, (barely) it also has 2" of extra distance.
*Image quality. Overall, the Carl Zeiss 16-80mm, barely.
*Distortion. The same, except for the long end, then it's the CZ, but not by much.
*Chromatic aberrations. CZ 16-80mm has a little better control.
*Bokeh. CZ better at 80mm F/4.5.
*Value. The same.
個人積分：38分
文章編號：7234176
個人積分：210分
文章編號：7235283
所以就把戀大當初對這兩隻鏡頭的開箱文給拉了出來
大家當個比較參考吧~~
不過有些圖好像遺失了@@?
DT 16-80-ZA
DT 16-105
