分享無意中逛到的對撞測試影片,這讓我更了解TOYOTA的安全性...不太夠!?





同樣是小車做同樣的測試,

不知道是Renault的車體太勇,還是yaris 的車體太兩光?

結果就是大不相同。
2009-06-30 23:50 #1
本來還想說要買yaris嚕 看到你這一篇 我放棄他 我選擇我的雙腳安全 多謝你喔
妳不懂~這是在保護行人~

小心被鞭[無奈]
請勿不求甚解。
st61309 wrote:
同樣是小車做同樣的測試
同樣的測試?兩個影片中的Volvo款式不同重量差了近100公斤,怎能說是同樣的測試?

影片一:
Renault Modus: 1185 kg
Volvo 940 GLE: 1269 kg

影片二:
Toyota Yaris歐規: 1080 kg
Volvo 945: 1346 kg

這種對撞基本上光重量差距就能決定大半的結果。影片一中的Renault與Volvo重量只相差84公斤,影片二中的Toyota與Volvo卻差了266公斤,立足點顯然差很多。

儘管如此,如果你有點進影片二在Youtube所提供的連結去讀該測試單位的原文報導的話,你會發現這些瑞典人給予Yaris在這次測試中的表現很高的評價,反而是Volvo 945被Yaris撞得很慘,乘員重傷或死亡的可能性很高。

原文連結:
http://www.alltommotor.se/artiklar/nyheter/krockprov-toyota-yaris-vs-volvo-945-1.9939/crash-test-volvo-945-vs-toyota-yaris-1.10023

節錄原文對Yaris的評價:
"In our unique test, the Yaris proves impressively safe – it even manages a head-on collision at high speed with the significantly larger and heavier Volvo 945."

"The Yaris conducts itself exactly as it should. Even though it has such short deformation zones, the body still absorbed most of the crash energy. Take a look at the left front wheel, which has moved sideways instead of jamming into the torpedo wall. But you can still see it was one mighty crash, on the limit even of what a modern car can take," says Kullgren and adds:

"We know through Euro-Ncap that Yaris is among the safest small cars we have. Now we also see that it can handle a collision with a significantly heavier car."

節錄原文對Volvo 945的評價:
"He gasps as he approaches the Volvo.

"My goodness, take a look at the entry into the compartment. The left wheel has been jammed into the torpedo wall and pushed in the entire floor. The driver would have sustained serious leg injuries, probably also severe damage to the pelvis. Look at the steering column, it looks like it got rammed into the driver’s chest. It’s questionable if the driver could have survived the crash," he says.

The A-pillar has yielded, as has the kick threshold which has been jammed towards the B-pillar. The entire long front has crumpled like a beer can. It’s a horrific sight.

"There is data in the dummy we are going to have to analyse, but right now you can say that the driver would not have survived without the airbag, at least not an elderly driver," he says."
之前就常耳聞頭又大的安全性不怎麼樣,

看到真正的測試影片才能感受到那種震撼!

要是我是yaris車主看完影片心裡多少會有一點毛毛的,

不然就還是只能套一句老話:車子慢慢開就好...

說實在的,車禍機率比中大樂透頭獎機率高很多,

隨便粗估一下,

如果駕駛觀念良好或慢慢開給你減少個10%發生遺憾的機率,

輪胎用好一點減少5%,有6顆SRS以上又減少5%,

有防滑系統減少5%(防滑在國外的統計數字比這高)

車體剛性強減少5%...

整體加起來所減少發生危險或遺憾的機率相當可觀,

之前Altis改款取消掉全車系的防滑系統,

無視消費者行車危險機率的提高,

我覺得非常不可取,

這是我個人一些小小的看法,給需要的人參考看看,
st61309 wrote:
之前就常耳聞頭又大的安全性不怎麼樣,

看到真正的測試影片才能感受到那種震撼!
原文太多不逐字翻譯了,希望你能看懂以上我引用的原文部分,別再沒了解細節前就下結論。
blhsing wrote:
請勿不求甚解。同樣的...(恕刪)


Volvo 945: 1346 kg

其實也沒多重,現在的路上一堆車比它重,自家品牌的Camry 2.4 就1505kg了

Ford Focus 也要1400KG左右,

不難想像勉強才撞贏幾十年老車的Yaris和這些同樣新世代的房車對撞會有多慘了,

可能就不只腳斷掉這麼簡單,這或許就是小車的宿命,還是別牌的小車會比較硬?

這就不得而知了,改天找找看有沒有類似的測試報告再來分享了。

st61309 wrote:
Volvo 945: 1346 kg

其實也沒多重,現在的路上一堆車比它重,自家品牌的Camry 2.4 就1505kg了

Ford Focus 也要1400KG左右,

不難想像勉強才撞贏幾十年老車的Yaris和這些同樣新世代的房車對撞會有多慘了,

可能就不只腳斷掉這麼簡單,這或許就是小車的宿命,還是別牌的小車會比較硬?

這就不得而知了,台灣就沒有類似的機構進行相關的測試然後公布出來。
"In our unique test, the Yaris proves impressively safe"

"We know through Euro-Ncap that Yaris is among the safest small cars we have. Now we also see that it can handle a collision with a significantly heavier car."

我黑體起來的這兩句原文有這麼難懂嗎?
blhsing wrote:
"In our un...(恕刪)



純粹是要酸頭又大的
歐洲人講了什麼重要嗎?
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 29)