[純討論,非討戰] 這台A6是怎麼了,Quattro應該沒這麼弱吧?

文章關鍵字
Scintilla wrote:
有沒有人可以解釋一下...(恕刪)

花生省魔術
那一台好像是A8的車型.感覺車子很長
看不懂,還是不知道到底發生啥事耶
????????????????



不是很清楚要表達什麼 這台audi應是前驅車吧? audi好像沒出後驅車啊? 有沒有專家可以幫忙解釋一下?
Scintilla wrote:
有沒有人可以解釋一下...(恕刪)


首先那是A8.........不是A6

第二 這裡都討論過了

國外網友都罵翻了 看來BMW耍了一點心機

利用torque sensing的Torsen EDL所做的一個測試 並非真實狀況

文中並提到 Audi Quattro踩一點煞車 也是可以脫困的

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGWsogAlZLE

eingeladenhussein (2 個月 以前)
this video is tricked so much and has nothing to with a real competitive between xDrive and Quattro.
As you can see the bmw is on the brakes the whole time and when they repeat it with the Audi, they don't brake anymore because they know precisely, that Audi is using a Torsen-Diff.
Torsen is a shortcut for "torque sensing" which means that the balancing of powertrain torque between front and rear is based pure mechanically on the actual need of torque,

eingeladenhussein (2 個月 以前) eingeladenhussein
The cowardly absurd men knew about this fact and try to fake this complete damn experiment by not braking the Audi. If they would have done, they had to admit that the Quattro System is much more effectively than xDrive.
I would lovely see the xDrive-multi-disc-clutches blowing up overheating in heavy snow while the Torsen distributes the torque hour by hour.
Only noobs will fall for this ...

eingeladenhussein (2 個月 以前)
So how can you fix it?
This is so simple. The only thing you have to do is to brake a little bit while you step on the gas. So then the absorbed torque of the free spinning axle becomes bigger, the Torsen gives much more torque to the other axle and the car will move foreward conmpletely without any problems.

eingeladenhussein (2 個月 以前)
not of rotary speed of the wheels as in the BMW.
So if a Quattro stands on free dynamometer roller with only one axle, this axle doesn't absorb any torque so the Torsen has no chance to distribute any torque to the other axle. So the speed of free axle will raise up but the car won't move because the Torsen is torque sensing not speed sensing or rotary sensing or something like this. Did you understand that?
Naricissistic, my god I love it
tom tseng wrote:
不是很清楚要表達...(恕刪)


是Quattro...四驅...

不過我也不知道這影片是在測試什麼?
在實驗抓地力嗎?

Subaru有一個很有名的實驗 有在youtube上播放

這種滾輪平時都是用在模擬四輪傳動汽車輪胎失去抓地力時

舉例來說冬天的結冰路面 車輛是否能夠針對路面狀況

將動力轉移到其他輪子上 提供駕駛者與車輛脫困的能力

語言似乎是歐洲語言與英文

感覺BMW 5是X的

A8 Q 在結冰路面無法有效將動力移轉
netwu001 wrote:
是Quattro.....(恕刪)


這影片在測試什麼,不是很明顯嗎?

影片是模擬後輪失去抓地力的狀況。xDrive成功的把扭力輸出到前輪,所以很輕鬆的從滾輪下來。A8則下不來。

不過前面網友已經解釋得非常清楚了,關鍵在於torsen的作動方式,這影片完全是誤導。
Aluminum wrote:

"As you can see the bmw is on the brakes the whole time and when they repeat it with the Audi, they don't brake anymore "

.......(恕刪)


hello Alu :) i am not so sure about they said...

me understanding is both the 5er and A8 drviers' foot had been put on the brake paddle as both cars tail light were "on" when they about to see some rotation of the rear wheels...

and those guys at the comment you post said 5er did the brake but either the A8 ?

why is that?

obviously the BMW were only on the brake before it took off

and i saw the Audi were also only on brake before it stat to rev ....

thanks for the kindly reply
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!