2018~2019一年多資產減少近億，慘!

我就是愛拍照 wrote:
這倒是。
就看R大處...(恕刪)

JuliusCeasar wrote:
「功力或許不同，但...(恕刪)

JuliusCeasar wrote:
沙烏地阿拉伯的石油是美元做為世界貨幣的重要支撐之一

Origins Of The Petro-Dollar

The myth of the Petro-dollar comes from efforts in the 1970s to prevent the U.S. suffering severe negative effects in its balance of payments from rising oil prices. Until the late 1960s the U.S. had been an oil-exporter, but by also being an oil consumer they had never sought to maximize the rent from oil production by driving prices upwards. OPEC countries, however, never had such qualms and when the opportunity arose as the U.S. became an importer, happily restrained supply to drive prices, and their own national incomes, higher. The U.S. was worried about the resultant trade deficit caused by suddenly having to pay vast amounts for necessary imports, and so secured the agreement of Saudi Arabia to only trade oil in U.S. dollars, meaning the U.S. could pay for oil in their own currency. Saudi Arabia, for their part, accumulated huge reserves of U.S. dollars, investing some of them back into the U.S. economy.
A general view shows the Secco Petrochemical complex in Shanghai on March 26, 2018. (JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images)

A general view shows the Secco Petrochemical complex in Shanghai on March 26, 2018. (JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images)
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The enormous lake of U.S. dollars this created augmented the role of the dollar as the global reserve currency, being a highly liquid, easily-exchanged claim on the products, services and investment potential generated by the U.S. economy. But this was merely one step in the rise of the greenback as the global reserve. The next step came when other economies–East Asia in particular–followed the lead of the oil producers and also built up huge reserves of U.S. dollars, all of which was made possible by the abandonment of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate system in the early 1970s. This practice helped to keep exchange rates for exporters low, and kept a lid on inflation in the U.S., which suited everyone up to a point.

Future Petro-Yuan?

Bringing this up to date, it was a long time ago when the link between oil and the dollar mattered much at all beyond the financial returns of non-dollar based oil companies. Since the 1980s, the dollar has been consolidated as the global reserve currency because of the strength and dynamism of the U.S. economy, and oil exporters have demanded to be paid in U.S. dollars because that's the currency they prefer to hold on to. To do otherwise is to take on exchange risk. Exporters can, and routinely do, accept payment in whatever exchange medium they wish -- tanks, planes and construction services -- but their central banks demand dollars for reasons entirely unconnected to oil. Because the U.S. dollar is a hard currency, easily exchangeable, underwritten by the U.S. taxpayer, and founded upon decades of broadly consistent macro-economic policy management.

Those who believe that oil being traded in U.S. dollars gives the U.S. economy a unique advantage in the global economy have it exactly the wrong way around. The U.S. economy is the central economy in the global system because it is the most open, innovative, and productive economy in the world, and because of this, the U.S. dollar is the most convenient, liquid and reliable medium of exchange. One can imagine another currency challenging it at some point in the future, but only on the basis of the openness of its underlying economy, and the depth of the capital markets denominated in it. And if the euro can't do it yet, why does anyone imagine the yuan is up to the job?

JuliusCeasar wrote:
將爆雷R大和爆雷「資深的證券公司老董」放在相同地位，這或許太抬舉R大了？？

JuliusCeasar wrote:
「假若沒被詐騙或踩中暴雷平台而能賺個一億的話...那變成既敢又有功夫吧....」？？
我不會這樣想。我只會認為你祖上積德讓你運氣好。

JuliusCeasar wrote:
註3：那40~50位...看到R大成功沒想到可能只是R大命好嗎？？還是看到更多R大真神人的證據？？可以出來解解惑嗎....

我就是愛拍照 wrote:
雖然他現在虧了，但我看他善後的能力也還不差，雖敗不亂。
比版上（不是單指本樓留言者）常常上來問怎麼信用協商的菜鳥好多了。
前事不忘，後事之師。不經一事，不長一智。
經過了，有學到了，下次不要再錯，這樣就好了，
人生就是一場過程，過去的事就不必太計較了吧？

lovebabyy wrote:
由此可見群組煽動的魔力，但我要修正自己的說法，這不完全是「同溫層」，而是催眠+坑殺，裡面有人是獲益的。
通常這種弔詭的微妙資訊，我都視為警訊。賣盤想脫手，與牽線的談出不錯的條件，牽線的有利可圖，施點小惠給買家，有何不可。
冤大頭還會為了拿到紅包笑呵呵呢。

rickchiu wrote:
其實他可以借1.6%低利員工房貸(當然他不敢借)...貸個600萬去買大陸銀行5%的產品...

rickchiu wrote:
當然，也可以選些牛皮股啦......只是20年後，也許腰斬，或許翻N倍...

rickchiu wrote:
那外掛為何還發紅包? 肯定外掛自己有另外的好處阿.......(恕刪)

Mirage-Ulysses wrote:
[以我現在的狀況 就算手邊有百億 對我而言 就真的有意義嗎？ 我覺得 可能還是沒什麼意義

Mirage-Ulysses wrote:
(說到底 就是你的理論 你的想法 理論上才是最好的？ 而我們大部份人
卻沒有那麼好的想法 或利用手邊的金流 很輕鬆的去創出更多金流。)

Mirage-Ulysses wrote:
但倘若我真走相似路線，以實務來說 我畢生心血恐怕重損五成~六成以上！ (基本人性介入之後)]

rickchiu wrote:
但是很多人連5%的理財產品路線都嚇得要死，深怕會血本無歸....這種人其實連投都不敢投...