油價改變了華江橋-今天更遇到超扯的事故


美國賓州的輕型摩托車法律﹕

http://www.state.pa.us/papower/cwp/view.asp?Q=439295&A=11

MOTOR SCOOTERS NOT STREET LEGAL 輕型摩托車不准上公共道路
HARRISBURG: With motor scooters most likely on many children’s Holiday Wish Lists,
state Department of Transportation cautioned that their use on Pennsylvania roadways and
public sidewalks is illegal and strictly prohibited.
“While motor scooters have become a popular form of transportation over the past several
years with children and teens, their use on public roads and sidewalks can be dangerous,
and they are illegal,” said Betty L. Serian, Deputy Secretary for Safety Administration at
PennDOT. “Parents should consider the safety and restricted use of these vehicles before
purchasing.”
Although many models exist in today’s market, typically a motor scooter is a two tandemwheeled
(one in front of the other) vehicle powered by an engine (gasoline or electric) and
may or may not have a seat or saddle for the driver. The term motor scooter includes small
motorcycles, mini-bikes, mini-cycles and the more recent “pocket bikes” and “pocket
rockets,” as well as motorized standing scooters.
“While it’s legal for foot-powered, non-motorized scooters to be used on sidewalks, electric
or gas motor-powered versions can only be ridden on private property,” said Serian.
Under the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, motor scooters are classified as motor vehicles. To be
legally operated on the road, a motor scooter is required to be registered, inspected and
insured. However, many scooters do not have the equipment requirements needed to pass
inspection. Unlike a conventional motor vehicle, motor scooters are unenclosed vehicles that
expose the operator to the risk of an immediate, unprotected impact with other motor
vehicles and pedestrians, without the benefit of safety equipment such as fenders, turn
signals, lights or tires suitable for highway use. Moreover, many of the motor scooters are
not certified to meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, minimum federal equipment
standards required for all new vehicles, which are manufactured for use on the roadways.
“The lack of safety equipment, coupled with the fact that many motor scooters are so small
they cannot be seen by other drivers, poses a hazard to the scooter drivers and other
motorists,” Serian said. “Some scooters stand only 18 inches high or less.”
In addition to the registration, inspection, equipment and insurance requirements, scooters
may not be operated by unlicensed drivers if driven on highways or public sidewalks.
Scooters are commonly purchased for use by children and teens, most of whom do not
possess a driver’s license.
A common misconception is that scooters that have an engine with less than five brake
horsepower do not fall under regulation. All scooters, regardless of horsepower, are
regulated. Brake horsepower, a measure of power at the point of delivery, is used to
define the power of scooters and mopeds.
There are a few motor scooters, however, manufactured for highway use. These scooters
have a certification label on them, which certifies that they meet federal equipment
standards. A 17-digit vehicle identification number is also affixed on these scooters by the
manufacturer, transferable to the purchaser with either a manufacturer’s certificate of
ownership or a title. These scooters conform to federal and state vehicle equipment
requirements and standards and, when properly registered, inspected and insured, may be
operated on the highway by a licensed driver.
素八滷 福斯的車價 水貨車的保固 賓士的零件價格 法拉利的待料時間
Ah-luba wrote:
400cc?600cc?
聽說?好像是?猜測的?
禁行"公共道路"?
噗...你以為只有你住過美國加州嗎?
我也住過LA捏,我在LA高速公路上看過250cc的速克達捏...


我是猜的沒錯﹐ 我不清楚多少CC以下是禁止上公路的。

不過個人認為 250cc 不算是輕型摩托車。

那麼台灣滿街跑的 50cc 難道是給猴子騎的﹖
素八滷 福斯的車價 水貨車的保固 賓士的零件價格 法拉利的待料時間
Pachilla wrote:
我是猜的沒錯﹐ 我不...(恕刪)


是你自己一開始就沒定義你所謂的輕型還重型吧
況且你還指說是400 or 600

日本50cc也是只能單坐要待轉


其實國內50cc近年來也越來越少了
最好50cc也要加入路考...
雖然路考制度也該改一下
Ducati_S2R wrote:
是你自己一開始就沒定...(恕刪)


我之前給的資料有誤差﹐其實不是用 CC 數算的。
我已經找到了相關資料﹕

If a motorcycle or motor driven cycle is capable of a top speed above 20 miles per hour and is equipped with components (such as lights, mirrors, and turn signals) that are needed for on-road use, NHTSA will regard it as having been primarily manufactured for such purposes. Motorcycles and motor-driven cycles with these capabilities and equipment cannot be lawfully imported into the U.S. unless they were originally manufactured to comply with all applicable FMVSS and bear a label certifying such compliance that is permanently affixed by the original manufacturer. The label must be affixed to a permanent member of the vehicle, as close as is practicable to the intersection of the steering post and the handle bars, so that its contents can be easily read without moving any part of the vehicle except for the steering mechanism. In addition, the vehicle’s manufacturer is required to submit to NHTSA identifying information on itself and the products it manufactures to the FMVSS (as required by 49 CFR Part 566), provide NHTSA with information the agency would need to decipher the VIN the manufacturer is required (under 49 CFR Part 565) to assign to each motor vehicle manufactured for sale in the U.S., and designate a U.S. resident as its agent for service of process (as required under 49 CFR 551.45).

任何機車廠商要讓他們的產品道路合法必須將產品送去美國高速公路安全局認證通過才可以在美國道路上掛牌合法使用。 但是通過的標準間接的排除了大部份的輕型摩托車通過認證的可能。
素八滷 福斯的車價 水貨車的保固 賓士的零件價格 法拉利的待料時間
shinbox wrote:
A motor-dr...(恕刪)


下次您到加州時記得騎一臺 149cc 以下的機車上高速公路看看 CHP 會如何反應嘍

我也從來沒有看過加州公路上面有禁止 Motor-Driven-Cycle 的牌子耶。
素八滷 福斯的車價 水貨車的保固 賓士的零件價格 法拉利的待料時間
反正我們騎機車的用路權限都已經被定位為次等公民了
不想被當作次等公民?
很簡單
一人一台車
要塞就大家一起塞
開車的才是老大
Pachilla wrote:
反對開放禁行機車道﹐...(恕刪)


並不沒每個機車騎士都是邪惡的交通違規集團成員.

如果禁行機車道設置是合理的,那是否也應該有對等數量的禁行汽車道呢? 基於公平的行的權利.
如果做不到這點,如何讓機車騎士機車騎士心服口服.

再論,私家汽車的單位排氣量的乘載人數,和單位道路面行駛的車輛數,都遠遠不及機車,
佔用這麼多的道路資源合理嗎? 況且還有專用快速道路.

他國交通法規如何如何,那是他國的事,
該問的機車被排擠在邊邊的小車道公平嗎? 有人問過大多數機車騎士的意見嗎?
Pachilla wrote:
任何機車廠商要讓他們的產品道路合法必須將產品送去美國高速公路安全局認證通過才可以在美國道路上掛牌合法使用。 但是通過的標準間接的排除了大部份的輕型摩托車通過認證的可能。

這個做法我認為很合理,
不是一次打死的無差別級禁止,
而是嚴格檢驗車子的穩定性、安全性、性能、續航力等條件,
再決定其是否適合行駛於公路上,
很公平先進的做法啊...

台灣應該多學學,不要老是擲杯來決定誰可以上,誰不能上...
先進國家跟落後國家的做法落差真的很大啊...
umts wrote:

並不沒每個機車騎士都是邪惡的交通違規集團成員.

如果禁行機車道設置是合理的,那是否也應該有對等數量的禁行汽車道呢? 基於公平的行的權利.
如果做不到這點,如何讓機車騎士機車騎士心服口服.

再論,私家汽車的單位排氣量的乘載人數,和單位道路面行駛的車輛數,都遠遠不及機車,
佔用這麼多的道路資源合理嗎? 況且還有專用快速道路.

他國交通法規如何如何,那是他國的事,
該問的機車被排擠在邊邊的小車道公平嗎? 有人問過大多數機車騎士的意見嗎?


我也是騎機車上班的耶﹐ 那些蛇行高手在快慢車道之間穿來插去的行為﹐還有
還有前一陣子出名的哪位邊騎車邊吃便當還有袱面膜的小姐的嘆為觀止表演的存在﹐讓倒霉受害的是全體機車族﹐包含我自己。

這個公平麻﹖ 答案是 NO

合理麻﹖ 在先階段台灣公民守法心態建立前﹐汽車/機車分流是比較不會死人的方法﹐ 也就是所謂的必要之惡。
素八滷 福斯的車價 水貨車的保固 賓士的零件價格 法拉利的待料時間
Pachilla wrote:
我也是騎機車上班的耶...(恕刪)


不要再說現在是汽機車分流的笑話了
真的有做到"分流"的路段有多少?
道路面積的使用分配是多少比多少?

為啥汽車也是一堆人亂開
汽車族就沒跟著倒霉咧?


看你過往的發言
我想開車的時間也不少啊..
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 9)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!