之前使用完全沒有定速/ ACC的車通勤150km
幾個月後還是租屋了
目前看上TESLA 的AP
請問這種全速域的ACC可以讓150km/ day變成可能的事情嗎?
謝謝
但過了30歲以後,很明顯感覺到如果忙完一天,要再開一百多公里的路回家,體力上真的是很大的負擔
甚至曾經開到一半失憶,等回過神來已經到苗栗了,但上一個記憶點在新竹啊!!
現在換有ACC的車,我可以說,幫助超大! 雖然我不敢說我可以每天這樣通勤,但偶爾需要這樣跑時,真的沒太大問題。
所以樓主的問題,我認為有機會,但最好是直上特斯拉
因為特斯拉有比較完整的輔助駕駛,不單只是ACC+車道維持,特斯拉甚至有緊急閃避的能力
另一個重點是,一天跑150km的話,保養跟油耗會是很大的負擔,特斯拉幾乎免保養,加上電耗每公里只要0.2~0.3度電,一度電五塊的話,每公里才1~1.5元,這如果是加95的車,油耗要30km/L才有辦法達到一樣的能源費用,但現在根本沒有長途為主平均油耗能到30km/L的車(油電車跑長途並不那麼省油)
而且如果再加上保養費用的話,使用費用會差很多
如果樓主家裡能裝充電樁的話,可以認真考慮跟台電多請一個數位電表+二段式時間電價,只用離峰時段充電,一度電1.7元,一天只跑150KM,預計用掉30~35度電,晚上十點充到早上七點有九個小時,平均充電功率4KW就夠了。如果只使用離峰充電的話,每公里電耗的費用才4~5角,這就完全是油車無法企及的費用了
粥結輪 wrote:
之前使用完全沒有定速(恕刪)
只能說 如果精神不濟 請不要上路 (害人害己)
TESLA 的 AUTOPILOT 不是給你打瞌睡用的
TESLA 自己的官網都說 AUTOPILOT 需要 駕駛者持續的 注意路況, 隨時能夠介入"緊急事故發生時"的車輛操作
Feds Say Tesla Autopilot Is Partly to Blame for a 2018 Crash
AARIAN MARSHALLTRANSPORTATION09.04.2019 06:29 PM
The National Transportation Safety Board says the design of Tesla's Autopilot contributed to a crash in which the driver did not actively steer for 13 minutes.
The design of Tesla’s Autopilot feature contributed to a January 2018 accident in which a Model S sedan smashed into the back of a fire truck in Southern California, according to federal safety investigators. It is the second time the National Transportation Safety Board has found Tesla partially responsible for a crash involving the semiautomated feature. The federal board says it’s also investigating two other Autopilot-involved crashes.
No one was hurt in the 2018 crash, but investigators found that the driver had flipped on Autopilot about 14 minutes before the crash and had not actively steered for the final 13 minutes. Investigators said the driver’s inattention and overreliance on Autopilot were probable causes of the crash. During those final 14 minutes, the car warned the driver to apply pressure to the steering wheel four times, but he did not apply pressure in the roughly four minutes before the crash, investigators found. .......................