XC60 11月前生產的車, 到底要不要召回check?

Volvo glitch: The Institute identified a problem with the Volvo XC60 in the side test. A piece of plastic trim on the driver seat pushed against a service release button for the safety belt, which then detached from its anchor during the test.

"This would be a serious issue if it happened in a real crash, but it's not likely to happen and it's fixable," Lund explains. "Still, belts shouldn't come loose in a crash test. Volvo is fixing the problem so it won't be an issue with XC60 models produced after November 2009. Top Safety Pick applies only to these modified XC60s."

Consumers who own 2010 XC60s already on the road should see their Volvo dealer for repairs, Lund advises.


凡是2009 11月前生產XC60的車主注意喔
當車從側邊被撞時, 有個塑膠板會因為撞擊而擠壓到安全帶的固定鎖...
這會導致安全帶整個脫離固定鎖的意外

雖然是重大的問題
但是這是可以修的
請到原廠叫他們修理...

台灣的Volvo絕對一定要修理的 ( 11/20 5:15 PM volvo官網還沒公佈)

樓主麻煩請改主題一下幫忙宣導一下
感恩~
malinger0316 wrote:
凡是2009 11月前生產XC60的車主注意喔
當車從側邊被撞時, 有個塑膠板會因為撞擊而擠壓到安全帶的固定鎖...
這會導致安全帶整個脫離固定鎖的意外
..(恕刪)


是啊,希望可以發揮群聚效應,最好是VOLVO台灣原廠受到輿論壓力後,發出全面召回處理,讓XC60車主可以安心,並能夠感受到VOLVO台灣廠商的用心.
真沒後悔買了 XC60
安全性, 駕馭感都是一流
希望 VOLVO 能力稟承下去 再生產更多讓人感動的車
大贏家因該是Subaru.....
每款都在名單內.......
根據我得到的完整內容應該是下文:
Situation
Volvo Car Corporation (VCC) has decided to perform a safety recall on 9 667 XC60 cars model year 2010 with US/Canada specification. Please see below list on affected markets.

Market No of Cars Market No of Cars
United States 8 155 Korea 4
Canada 1 218 Norway 3
Germany 155 Sweden 3
VCC Internal 52 Undelivered 2
United Kingdom 18 Hungary 2
TDS 11 U.A.E. 1
Italy 8 Czeckia 1
Switzerland 7 Denmark 1
Japan 7 Finland 1
Netherlands 6 France 1
Belgium 5 Poland 1
Spain 4 Slovenia 1
TOTAL 9 667

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has conducted a side impact crash test on the Volvo XC60 MY 2010 for their upcoming ratings presentation in November (top safety picks etc). During the test of the XC60 the seat belt was released from the fixing point on the driver seat's left hand side. After thorough investigations Volvo can conclude the crash test result was caused by the plastic ribs inside the driver seat side cover panel. During impact, the ribs may strike the seat belt release button which causes the belt to release. There are no previous incident reports or customer complaints, neither at Volvo nor at IIHS and NHTSA.
At Volvo Cars we take this seriously and have therefore decided to conduct a recall campaign on 9 667 XC60 MY 2010 with US/Canada specification on markets were these cars are sold.

Statement
• During a left side impact crash test at IIHS the safety belt on a XC60 was released at the fixing point on the driver's seat.
• To the best of our knowledge this has never happened on the roads or in any of our crash tests. Volvo does not have any field reports or records from about 50 side impact crash tests conducted at VCC during the development of the XC60.
• However, since safety is at the core of Volvo's brand and we take this single crash test result very seriously we have decided to recall the XC60 MY 2010. After thorough investigations Volvo has come to the conclusion that the corrective action is to remove the plastic ribs inside the plastic cover on the left side of the driver seat (protecting the side of the seat) which have caused the situation.
• This action only concerns the driver's seat on cars with a US/Canada specification.
• There are different technical solutions and specifications on seats and models depending which market the cars are aiming for. Therefore are not all sold XC60 cars included in this recall.

Q: Can this happen to any other Volvo car model with another specification than US/Canada?
A: The vehicle that failed the IIHS test was conducted with a US market vehicle with a unique design of the seat belt. However, we will analyse all our different models and specifications in order to find out if there is any risk that this can occur.
也就是說只有北美規格的車才會受影響,因為它們的安全帶機構與歐規有所不同,當然,除非是平行輸入車那就另當別論。

malinger0316 wrote:
Volvo glit...(恕刪)

所以目前 Taiwan XC60 應該不用 call back 了. 但還是要請 Taiwan VCC 正式說明一下, 比較好.
丐幫幫主 wrote:
大贏家因該是Suba...(恕刪)


素把路...真的太扯了...每款都有他....真是救感心!
大贏家是subaru吧!

專注本質 近乎苛求???

不過放心 雙b"在台灣"還是賣的嚇嚇叫...

貴?(國外可不貴)=安全 烙印在台灣人心理

尤其拿來把妹......

其實IIHS和NCAP還是有些差距
新款legacy雖然NCAP勉強五星 但內容不甚理想
VOLVO S40 IIHS 側撞 可 但 NCAP 令人印象深刻安全
IIHS的車頂硬度測試好像跟現實脫節 (非翻滾)

好像參考現實世界的統計資料才準


DAVID-CHEN wrote:
其實IIHS和NCA...(恕刪)


S40在NCAP的測試好像是2004年的舊標準,NEW LEGACY則是用最新標準。新標準加測了一項Side Pole Impact,這項測試非常嚴苛,目前好像還沒有看到有哪輛是GOOD,或許可以找台WRCar來測,看看有沒有機會...
除了保護乘客安全之外,大家常常都忽略了步行者保護,針對這一點,SUBARU的得分都很高,算是很有良心的車廠。畢竟車內是人,車外也是人,發生事故的時候,所有的生命都應該被保護。
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!