博士級的統計分析出來了。TSMC浄贏43%

chaoban wrote:
請問一下喔，你們在...(恕刪)

引用原文如下:
It is true that Geekbench's battery test is a synthetic benchmark. It drains the battery by putting a lot of stress on the SoC -- CPU and GPU alike. It is designed to measure battery life under heavy load, e.g. while playing graphics-intensive games. Of course, one might argue that this is not representative of typical real-world usage. In fact, for the most common tasks like browsing the web and even light graphics usage, the screen has the highest battery consumption, and thus differences in battery lifetime between models with TSMC and Samsung chip will be small. This is in agreement with those new studies mentioned above. Notwithstanding, for the usage scenario tested by Geekbench (e.g. lots of games, little browsing), my analysis provides compelling evidence that the devices with TSMC chip are indeed much better. So, if this is your usage scenario, then you better make sure you get an iPhone with a SoC manufactured by TSMC.

mobile0134 wrote:
再清楚不過了。買到...(恕刪)

griffon wrote:
多倫多什麼時候變成...(恕刪)

colastar wrote:
看了幾天.愈看愈覺...(恕刪)

油炸豆腐 wrote:
結論就是﹐ 台機電太厲害了﹐ 居然可以利用自身技術提昇蘋果產品的效率﹐ 以後蘋果會好好考慮是否跟台機電共同開發晶片。