還沒定案咧,慢慢看戲吧!
這種事情,拖來拖去,搞不好產品下市了才定案!
無善無惡心之體 有善有惡意之動 知善知惡是良知 為善去惡是格物
阿婆功能贏不了,就打官司,禁止別人賣,有必要嗎。
剛好HTC買下的S3
也被判蘋果侵權兩項
這是剛好戰平嗎?
lien291
The first one, 6,343,263, was filed in August 1994 -- 17 years ago -- and covers "Real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data." Meaning, roughly, it handles data ("voice, facsimile, video and the like") being sent to it from other devices over a network. There is no mention in the patent of wireless networks, cellular phones or really anything you'd directly associate with a smartphone except the sending and receiving of data.

You can imagine that many -- or all -- smartphones would need to be able to receive and process real-time data from outside sources, so whether Apple's infringement claim on it will stop at HTC, or Android, or anywhere, seems to be an open question.

The second patent, 5,946,647, was filed in February 1996, and treats an even more generic subject: System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data. What's that, you ask? Well, if you open an email on your HTC touch-screen phone, you are in fact using your finger to interact with a piece of data. By touching it, you are commanding the phone to perform an action (like "open") on the email. This patent has to do with the system that, for instance, tells the phone to open the email.

Los Angeles Times 詳細專利內容

被判的兩項,看來是軟體的問題,那所有android廠都會有問題
這兩個專利感覺很廣泛,也是十幾年前的專利。一個是手機資料的傳輸,一個是用手指跟資料互動,像用手點螢幕開啓email。這樣也能判決成功?實在令人不解啊!!

最後的損失是消費者吧
廠商把錢都拿去打官司,付律師,最後就反映到價格給消費者
這樣打專利戰,佈局一些很廣泛的專利,阻止對方發展,把人家踢出市場,只會拖慢科技發展的速度

蘋果最新申請成功的一個專利是,螢幕可以直相橫相轉換。這種很直覺的操作方式,蘋果也能宣稱是自己的?

Jazymonkey wrote:
- U.S. Pat...(恕刪)


美國法院。 美國公司


我們哪有贏面啊?
怎麼可能,前陣子不是才說ITC傾向於判htc勝訴嗎?
美國法院,美國企業。怎麼打?

唉…

Sent from my HTC.

Jazymonkey wrote:
- U.S. Pat...(恕刪)


你說的真好。心有戚戚焉。
我記得還有HTC的反告 還有蘋果的加告...所以還沒完勒XD

雖然平常都不發言..但我最喜歡看這種告來告去的了(什麼毛病)

總之要定案還要滿久的..
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 15)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!