台灣下一代的主力戰機應具備的功能

九月初就有相關的消息了:
http://insidedefense.com/daily-news/air-force-pursuing-limited-competition-f-16-aesa-radar-upgrade
Air Force pursuing 'limited competition' for F-16 AESA radar upgrade

可惜的是上面網頁必須要登錄為會員才能繼續閱讀後面的內容,幸好有人把文章內容轉貼到國外的討論區裡:
The Air Force confirmed this week it has initiated a limited-source competition to procure new advanced electronically scanned array radars for a portion of its F-16 fleet.

The service released a request for proposals Aug. 4 as well as a limited and classified justification and approval, according to Air Force spokesman Maj. Rob Leese. An RFP had been expected last spring.

"The competition is a limited competition under a limited and classified J&A," according to Leese, who said the service decided to restrict competition based on national security reasons and a limited number of suppliers.

The service last August submitted a $113 million reprogramming request to purchase 24 Northrop Grumman-built AESA radars to equip Air National Guard F-16s operating in U.S. Northern Command. The service had planned to utilize an existing contract on which Lockheed Martin would be the prime integrator with Northrop providing its APG-83 radar. Congress denied the request -- which would have provided the necessary funding to field the radars by 2017 -- and instead directed the service to hold a competition for the work.

It is unclear how many companies were targeted through the limited competition. A Raytheon spokesman confirmed the company would offer a proposal and a Northrop Grumman spokesman declined to comment.

Congress appropriated $40 million for the effort in fiscal year 2016 and called on the service to submit a report on its initial upgrade plans as well as its plans to expand the scope of the program and install the radars across its fleet. The FY-17 budget did not include funds for additional radars.

Pentagon acquisition chief Frank Kendall told Congress in a June report that a fighter force structure study due this fall will inform the scope of the F-16 AESA radar upgrade, Inside Defense previously reported.

"If the Air Force decides to request this program as an FY-18 new start, initial fielding of radar upgrades would begin no earlier than FY-22, and the overall quantity will be balanced with the F-35A procurement and fielding plan," Kendall wrote in the report.

The acquisition strategy is expected to include options to field up to 300 radars on F-16 C/D aircraft.

5月號的Combat Aircraft Monthly雜誌也有提到美軍F-16升級安裝AESA雷達相關的消息,預計要換裝的數量也是52架。

cche1079 wrote:
可以先ggogle完水上飛機的使用限制/實際性能 再來畫餅好嗎?

二戰搞過水上飛機當戰機的大日本帝國海軍的後代 海上自衛隊都不這樣搞了.......
...(恕刪)


日本那時還搞出潛艦裡面塞飛機
號稱潛水航空母艦
台灣人可悲呀 wrote:
我想VTOL應該哈很...(恕刪)

1. 臺灣的武器夠用了,老美的評估比我們在這裡瞎猜準確。
2. F35千萬別買,那飛機不漂亮,又死貴,真打起來管不管用還不知道。必要的時候,它自己就會飛過來,幹嘛買!
3. 垂直起降實在沒必要,從英國獵犬玩到現在快半世紀了,除了降在貨輪上那架外,有哪一次非垂直起降不可?幹嘛這麼死心眼。
7516178 wrote:
2. F35千萬別買,那飛機不漂亮
3. 垂直起降實在沒必要,從英國獵犬玩到現在快半世紀了,除了降在貨輪上那架外,有哪一次非垂直起降不可?


這是買國防武器 不是買跑車要去夜店把咩

英國領土可比台灣大多了 戰機有的是地方降落
JH_Shou wrote:
會如網友所說的 飛得出去 也找不到機場回來了..(恕刪)

這什麼話?不會飛去沖繩?等跑道修好,人家給你加油挂彈,再飛回來就好。李登輝叫“釣魚臺屬於日本”是有詭計滴!
PLAYER553386 wrote:
這是買國防武器 不是買跑車要去夜店把咩恕刪)

達索説:“漂亮的飛機不一定是好飛機,但好飛機一定漂亮”。F35就是一只肥妹,不把也罷。

7516178 wrote:
達索説:“漂亮的飛...(恕刪)

F-35對美國來說 也是騎虎難下
7516178 wrote:
達索説:“漂亮的飛機不一定是好飛機,但好飛機一定漂亮

F-22也不算漂亮的飛機
所以是兩光飛機?

yoshiyoyo wrote:
F-35對美國來說 ...(恕刪)

是啊!連美國自己都搞不定了,何況連上場露一腿都沒,誰知道它能打,好打?我是相信達索。
PLAYER553386 wrote:
F-22也不算漂亮的...(恕刪)

F22不是很漂亮,充其量中上姿色。
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!