伊朗試射反艦彈道導彈(ASBM),經美國確認發射二枚,一枚擊中

伊朗試射
反艦彈道導彈(ASBM)
經美國確認發射兩枚
一枚成功擊中

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.janes.com/article/68625/iran-successfully-tests-radar-guided-anti-ship-ballistic-missile

Iran successfully tests radar-guided anti-ship ballistic missile

Jeremy Binnie, London - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
10 March 2017

Iranian and US reports have corroborated a successful test of Iran's new Hormuz-2 radar-guided anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) in early March.

Iran's Tasnim news agency reported on 9 March that the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) had carried out the test. "We fired the Hormuz-2 missile this week," it quoted Brigadier General Amir Hajizadeh, the head of the IRGC Aerospace Forces, as saying. "It successfully destroyed a target within the range of 250 km."

When it was unveiled in May 2014, the Hormuz-2 appeared to be an active radar-guided variant of Iran's Khalij Fars ASBM, while the Hormuz-1 was said to be a passive radar-guided variant.

The Khalij Fars is a development of the Fateh-110 solid-fuel tactical ballistic missile fitted with an infrared seeker to enable it to home in on a ship's heat signature.

The radar-guided versions should be more capable than the Khalij Fars of locking on to ships that are obscured by cloud or haze, but the Hormuz-2 is potentially vulnerable to electronic warfare countermeasures.

Three days earlier, Fox News cited US officials as saying Iran carried out two ASBM tests on 4-5 March, with the second successfully hitting a floating platform 155 miles (250 km) away. One US official said the tests involved a "Fateh-110 Mod 3" with a "new active seeker".

The first ASBM was launched from the IRGC base in Bandar-e-Jask on the Gulf of Oman and landed "in the vicinity" of the floating platform it was aimed at on 4 March, and a second launched on the following day hit the target, the official said.

"It's a concern based on the range and that one of the missiles worked," one official was quoted as saying.
是說想起第一代的反艦飛彈冥河也是高拋彈道啊.
普通反艦飛彈 <--- 高彈道 x 終端導引 ---> 反艦彈道飛彈

世上的東西越來越難分類了
別問我的名字,我只是個舊時代的幻影.
連伊朗都辦得到的事,
再懷疑東風十五就很奇怪了,
美國的龐大航母艦隊,
該想想未來的出路.

dz6810 wrote:
連伊朗都辦得到的事...(恕刪)


導彈比載具利害的時刻到了。
龐大的航母只是超大的靶子,
平常到處耀武揚威罷了,
真幹起來中看不中用。
dz6810 wrote:
連伊朗都辦得到的事...(恕刪)

"tests on 4-5 March"
這跟大多AAM的工作速度差不多吧?而且也沒說是不是終端速度

"hitting a floating platform"
只說是浮動平台,只能知道是在水面上但不知道是否有在移動

"destroyed a target within the range of 250 km"
短程彈道飛彈的射程

跟東風15傳說中的性能其實沒什麼類比性
別問我的名字,我只是個舊時代的幻影.
美帝海軍各種射程較遠的空射對地飛彈(LRASM,AGM-158ER)不就開始服役了嗎?
而且美帝現在有33艘能在海上反彈道飛彈的神盾艦.....就算真的給你發射短程彈道飛彈,很快就會被定位,然後戰斧飛彈慢慢就會飛到你面前把你整個山頭夷平....

飛彈如果沒有核彈頭的話,攻擊效率還是沒有載具高....
而且美帝航母打擊群就是可以在視距外起飛戰鬥機,然後把你家的所有東西夷平.....

ASRAAM wrote:
"hitting a floating platform"
只說是浮動平台,只能知道是在水面上但不知道是否有在移動


the Hormuz-2 appeared to be an active radar-guided variant of Iran's Khalij Fars ASBM, while the Hormuz-1 was said to be a passive radar-guided variant.

跟打高速戰機射後不理的那種飛彈一樣,
差別是,戰機小很多又高速飛行,
航母極為巨大又行動遲緩。
1.
伊朗A2/AD的需求是控制霍爾木茲海峽,

這個地方大型船艦跑不了多快,

而且伊朗海軍有把握追蹤海峽內每艘船艦的動向.

2.
美國國力遠勝伊朗,

但是美國用全國之力打伊朗目前看來不可能,

如果是小打小鬧的話被伊朗趕出海峽是常有的事.

10美軍遭伊朗扣留下跪 美軍指揮官被炒
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160513/860390/
nomo333 wrote:
伊朗試射反艦彈道導...(恕刪)


看過打靶的照片,這種導彈技術水平完全無法和東風21D相比。

這是种短程彈道導彈,彈頭沒有分離,是整體再入。這導致其末端速度很低,雷達和紅外特徵非常明顯,很容易被攔截(和海灣戰爭整體再入的飛毛腿一樣,愛國者pac2都能攔截)。

可以把其看作一个体积巨大的3mach高抛弹道反舰导弹。

qzz1129 wrote:
海灣戰爭整體再入的飛毛腿一樣,愛國者pac2都能攔截


有攔截到過嗎?
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!