美國總統參選人稱『2029年美國實現晶片獨立就放棄台灣』

美國議員Vivek Ramaswamy是共和黨參加明年總統大選的人選之一。他多次表示,美國現在應該保護台灣,但只要到2029年,等美國實現了晶片獨立,就放棄台灣。
大陸的時間點是2027年,應該不必擔憂。
qm671006 wrote:
美國議員Vivek Ramaswamy...(恕刪)
有美籍台灣副總統協助,可望提前達成
又出現謠言了

Vivek Ramaswamy 根本沒說要放棄台灣

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4183698-vivek-ramaswamy-john-roberts-fox-clash-taiwan/

Fox News anchor John Roberts pressed Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy over his views on defending Taiwan from China during an interview Friday.

Ramaswamy has isolated himself from the rest of the GOP primary field on a number of key policy issues, including not supporting continued aide for Ukraine in its war against Russia, and a radical proposal to cede territory taken by Russia in eastern Ukraine in exchange for Moscow ending its military alliance with China.

The tech entrepreneur’s views on Taiwan are another example of his unique agenda.

Roberts confronted Ramaswamy over his stance that America should only support Taiwan because it produces semiconductors.

“You’ve said that you’d fully back Taiwan until the U.S. becomes independent with semiconductors. So what happens after that point? Do we just give Taiwan to China,” Roberts asked.

“Don’t we also support a robust democracy off China’s shores? … They’re not just a factory,” he added.

Ramaswamy pushed back, calling Roberts’s assertion an incorrect characterization of what he has said, saying that he would resume “strategic ambiguity” — a government practice of withholding information on a strategy in foreign policy. In this case, it is related to whether the U.S. military would intervene, and to what extent, in a war across the Taiwan Strait.

“Recall that President Trump was derided by both parties for picking up a phone call from the Taiwanese president. … I’m upgrading to strategic clarity, saying that absolutely we will defend Taiwan until we get semiconductor independence,” Ramaswamy said.

The GOP hopeful also noted the bipartisan embrace of the “one-China policy,” another word for the U.S.’s policy of strategic ambiguity in Taiwan and the position held by the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that there is only one sovereign state under the name China.

“Both Republicans and Democrats, every other Republican in this race embraces the one-China policy. Strategic ambiguity, refusing to call Taiwan a nation,” Ramaswamy said.
兩軍對峙今若何,戰聲恰似迅雷過,奉天城外三更雪,百萬精兵渡大河
有差別嗎?

ho520 wrote:
“Recall that President Trump was derided by both parties for picking up a phone call from the Taiwanese president. … I’m upgrading to strategic clarity, saying that absolutely we will defend Taiwan until we get semiconductor independence,” Ramaswamy said.

「we will defend Taiwan until we get semiconductor independence」
這句是不是說,他領導的美國,會保護台灣,直到美國獲得半導體獨立為止?

慘欸....這種思維的美國候選人,似乎越來越多了。
這位議員也是主張台灣全民發槍的那位議員,最近還要廢掉50%聯邦公務人員,這位印度裔總統候選人有著很多奇奇怪怪的政見,看起來想肢解美國。
惡魔推銷員 wrote:
ho520 wrote:
“Recall that President Trump was derided by both parties for picking up a phone call from the Taiwanese president. … I’m upgrading to strategic clarity, saying that absolutely we will defend Taiwan until we get semiconductor independence,” Ramaswamy said.


「we will defend Taiwan until we get semiconductor independence」
這句是不是說,他領導的美國,會保護台灣,直到美國獲得半導體獨立為止?

慘欸....這種思維的美國候選人,似乎越來越多了。


有差別啊,就絕對和非絕對的差別。
美國永遠以自身利益做考量.台灣被當棄子很正常
美國人對黃種人地位比黑人還低
台灣的悲哀
ho520 wrote:
又出現謠言了 Vivek...(恕刪)

別難為他 看不懂英文

只能接收綠媒垃圾

美國不可能放棄第一島鏈的!

文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!