最近陷入這兩種的漩渦裡~~~很多賣冷氣的都說~買大關就好!!但是我覺得橫綱外觀好像比較高尚~~~好讓我兩難喔~~畢竟一次買兩台加起來可能價差一萬!!!有沒有大大可以拉我一把!!!!到底買橫綱還是大關.....

宜蘭小志 wrote:
最近陷入這兩種的漩...(恕刪)


有經濟考量當然是大關了,偵測功能只少一眼偵測,功率表效能差不多,多半一級節能的,有的還超過橫綱,不曉得是不是key錯了。
大金出橫鋼的用意到底是啥………
宜蘭小志 wrote:
大金出橫鋼的用意到...(恕刪)


可能宣示形象用吧。之前也是想在這兩者中擇一,研究兩者的節能表現,相差非常有限,但若以5.0KW為例,兩者價差5000元,這個價差,兩台用十年以上,橫綱都還不見得省得回來,所以買大關的CP值比較高。

即使如此,羊毛出在羊身上,可能請了少女團體宣示R32的優點,讓橫綱的價位硬是比其他一線廠牌的最高階機種貴了約一萬元(以5.0KW而言),但節能數字卻仍不如他牌使用R410A的機種,所以我改投入其他一線品牌懷抱。
看噸數大小 有幾台是大關的低頻表現比較好
雖然EER表現橫綱較好
但價差差了快一萬 所以應該大關CP值較高
不過大關的價位 還不如買日立頂級、國際LX之類的
純屬個人研究,不代表任何義務或立場
國際的頂級,有比大關還要安靜嗎??我需要6.3,跟5.0的
宜蘭小志 wrote:
最近陷入這兩種的漩...(恕刪)

阿兵哥 wrote:
可能宣示形象用吧。...(恕刪)


R32是可燃冷媒在美國是被禁止使用在分離式冷氣上的
多花錢是為了要多背負可燃性冷媒的風險?
不是因為最近多了一段超長的辣妹歌舞廣告轉嫁的廣告費嗎?
請問大大在那看到美國禁用R32冷媒的訊息
可以告知嗎??
都找不到相關資料耶!
美國總統都已經簽署通過可以使用R32冷媒,請別再說不能用了。

大金R-32也在2015 3月通過了美國EPA的認證,歐巴馬簽署。 依UL標準484規範。
大金美國 2015 03新聞稿

HFC-32 Refrigerant Receives EPA Approval via SNAP Program
March 10, 2015

Daikin North America LLC • Suite 500, 5151 San Felipe • Houston, TX 77056
Main: 713.861.2500 • www.daikincomfort.com
News Release
Contact: Rex Anderson - Director of Communications - 713.263.5064 - rex.anderson@goodmanmfg.com
HFC-32 Refrigerant Receives EPA Approval via SNAP Program
HOUSTON, March 10, 2015 - The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the coming
final approval of HFC-32 (R-32) refrigerant for use in certain refrigeration and air conditioning
applications. This final action addresses President Obama’s Climate Action Plan that calls on EPA’s
Significant New Alternative Policy (SNAP) Program to identify and approve additional climate-friendly
chemicals as determined by the EPA.
“This acceptance of R-32 is a great achievement for the Daikin organization. Not only did Daikin
representatives submit the application to the EPA,” states Takeshi Ebisu, President and CEO, “but this
action represents the EPA’s first SNAP approval of a lower global warming potential (GWP) refrigerant
for any household comfort cooling HVAC application in the United States.” Ebisu added: “A critical part
of the SNAP review and approval process is EPA’s consideration of whether an alternative is safe in its
proposed use. EPA’s SNAP approval is based on EPA’s conclusion that R-32 can be safely managed in
these applications.”
HFC-32 (R-32), a chlorine-free, single-component refrigerant, will now become an EPA approved
refrigerant for use in home air conditioning. It offers a global warming potential of about one-third
compared to currently used R-410A refrigerant. When used in approved refrigeration and air
conditioning products, up to 30% less refrigerant is needed for proper charge levels compared to R-410A
refrigerant, further reducing potential climate impact.
Successfully used across Asia, it is estimated that HFC-32 (R-32) refrigerant is contained in approximately
8 million total units in Japan and in approximately 5 million units manufactured by Daikin Industries, Ltd.
HFC-32 (R-32) will be approved for use in equipment meeting the requirements of UL Standard 484 and
the use conditions of the EPA SNAP approval. Such equipment includes package terminal air
conditioners, window room air conditioners and portable air conditioners.





宜蘭小志 wrote:
國際的頂級,有比大...(恕刪)


粉小聲 只有風扇的風聲

63應該裝客廳吧 也不怕吵

50大概主臥吧 如果外機不在窗邊也沒影響(裝窗邊也沒影響 事實真的小聲)

K就不建議了 室外機運作像飛機起飛(還會加速)
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!