我一直在考慮V60豪華和旗艦版的利弊:
volvo最重要的是City Save;這是標配;ACC 如不長期使用高速,好象也不太重要. 天窗見人見智.18吋鋁圈,我覺得17吋比較好看–最重要235/45/R17 vs 235/40/R18差0.4吋、没差多少 (有人訂過FRETA 8x18的輪圈嗎?)个人覺得音響差別也不太大(如是BOSE，那就值得考慮了)
覺得沒什麼必要選182W的頂級,各位大人可否給些意見?
Volvo V60 Standard 1,620,000
Option: Sunroof NTD 45000
Volvo V60 Premium 1,820,000
Do you really need ACC? Am I missing something?
個人積分：155分
文章編號：37371682
個人積分：61分
文章編號：37372278
個人積分：128分
文章編號：37372359
invent0831 wrote:
一年前買車的時候會覺...(恕刪)
Budget is not a major concern. The issue is do you need to pay for something that you know you will not need it. I drive to Taipei from Chungli almost once a week on weekend. I love to have cruise control. But do I really need ACC? I would if I live in Taipei and work in Hsinchu but I don't?
I always want to get the best CP value for my purchase.
個人積分：202分
文章編號：37372932
個人積分：65分
文章編號：37374194
個人積分：5分
文章編號：37379246
個人積分：568分
文章編號：37379341
個人積分：128分
文章編號：37383033
谷谷8989 wrote:
我的是頂級182的，...(恕刪)
I spent one hour yesterday, testing the HiFi between the premium and the regular model. My personal opinion, the upgraded Hi-Fi is 'too thin' I tested with a familiar CD by Susan Wong (Casa Nova Style songs)
The premium Hi-Fi need to adjust not only the bass and tremble but also the equalizer, still the sound is not as 'deep' and solid as the regular Hi-Fi.
Personal opinion, no offense!
個人積分：21分
文章編號：37387628
