6/17發po
或應該是看了台灣6/12的發表會
標題很有意思, 主題--Kymco’s new electric scooters could be the sign of a coming boom
結果副標是: Like with cars, established companies are following in the footsteps of startups
"像汽車一樣(老車廠追著特斯拉)，老牌公司正在追隨初創公司的腳步" [該說是跟什麼虫嗎?
]報導中有引述某位畢業自丹佛大學主攻智慧城市綠能等高階研究分析師: Ryan Citron的看法
從第九段講述二家業者對於使用上差別: There’s a key difference in how Kymco’s stations will work compared to Gogoro’s, though. With Gogoro’s battery stations, you drive up, drop your batteries into an empty slot, take new ones, and go. With Kymco’s, the idea is that you’ll drop your batteries off to charge, with the scooter running on an internal battery in the meantime. Around one hour later, you can pick the batteries back up, fully charged.
一個是換了就走; 一個是拿下月租或日租電池先充電, 然後先用核心電池電力離開, 一小時再回來拿充飽電池....
結果, 分析師這樣認為: “For me, that’s a major downfall compared to Gogoro,” Citron says. “It’s kind of bizarre.”
字典: downfall---惰落!!!!
"對我來說相較gogoro, 這顯然是種惰落, 且有些古怪""
當然, 記者後面也不忘拉抬[個人讀解是挺硬的啦]---幸運的是, 老業者尚有少數其他點子, 例如ev車箱有足夠空間可放額外三個電池, 搭配原有的1+2, 每趟外出旅程最多可續航達200公里......
參考參考囉
